Abstract:B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) is associated with immunosuppression and patients are at increased clinical risk following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Covid-19 vaccines offer the potential for protection against severe infection but relatively little is known regarding the profile of the antibody response following first or second vaccination. We studied spike-specific antibody responses following first and/or second Covid-19 vaccination in 299 patients with CLL compared with healthy donors. 286 patients … Show more
BACKGROUND
Cancer patients are considered a priority group for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination given their high risk of contracting severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, limited data exists regarding the efficacy of immunization in this population. In this study we assess the immunologic response after COVID-19 vaccination of cancer versus non-cancer population.
METHODS
PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science databases were searched from March 01, 2020, through August 12, 2021. Primary endpoints were anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (S) immunoglobulin G (IgG) seroconversion rates, T-cell response, and documented SARS-CoV-2 infection after COVID-19 immunization. Data was extracted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines. Overall effects were pooled using random effects models.
RESULTS
This systematic review and meta-analysis included 35 original studies. Overall, 51% (95% confidence interval [CI], 41-62) and 73% (95%CI, 64-81) of cancer patients developed anti-S IgG above the threshold level after partial and complete immunization, respectively. Patients with hematologic malignancies had a significantly lower seroconversion rate than those with solid tumors after complete immunization (65% vs 94%;
P
<0.0001). Compared to non-cancer controls, oncological patients were less likely to attain seroconversion after incomplete (RR 0.45 [95%CI 0.35-0.58]) and complete (RR 0.69 [95%CI 0.56-0.84]) COVID-19 immunization schemes. Cancer patients had a higher likelihood of having a documented SARS-CoV-2 infection after partial (RR 3.21; 95%CI 0.35-29.04) and complete (RR 2.04; 95%CI 0.38-11.10) immunization.
CONCLUSIONS
Cancer patients have an impaired immune response to COVID-19 vaccination compared to controls. Strategies that endorse the completion of vaccination schemes are warranted. Future studies should aim to evaluate different approaches that enhance oncological patients’ immune response.
BACKGROUND
Cancer patients are considered a priority group for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination given their high risk of contracting severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, limited data exists regarding the efficacy of immunization in this population. In this study we assess the immunologic response after COVID-19 vaccination of cancer versus non-cancer population.
METHODS
PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science databases were searched from March 01, 2020, through August 12, 2021. Primary endpoints were anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (S) immunoglobulin G (IgG) seroconversion rates, T-cell response, and documented SARS-CoV-2 infection after COVID-19 immunization. Data was extracted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines. Overall effects were pooled using random effects models.
RESULTS
This systematic review and meta-analysis included 35 original studies. Overall, 51% (95% confidence interval [CI], 41-62) and 73% (95%CI, 64-81) of cancer patients developed anti-S IgG above the threshold level after partial and complete immunization, respectively. Patients with hematologic malignancies had a significantly lower seroconversion rate than those with solid tumors after complete immunization (65% vs 94%;
P
<0.0001). Compared to non-cancer controls, oncological patients were less likely to attain seroconversion after incomplete (RR 0.45 [95%CI 0.35-0.58]) and complete (RR 0.69 [95%CI 0.56-0.84]) COVID-19 immunization schemes. Cancer patients had a higher likelihood of having a documented SARS-CoV-2 infection after partial (RR 3.21; 95%CI 0.35-29.04) and complete (RR 2.04; 95%CI 0.38-11.10) immunization.
CONCLUSIONS
Cancer patients have an impaired immune response to COVID-19 vaccination compared to controls. Strategies that endorse the completion of vaccination schemes are warranted. Future studies should aim to evaluate different approaches that enhance oncological patients’ immune response.
“…Given the complete dominance of Delta in the UK and surging prevalence globally, our data on NAb activity against VOCs have contemporary implications for the care of cancer patients who are at increased risk of adverse outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Studies in cancer patients to date have used seroconversion (i.e., detection of IgG antibodies against WT spike) as the main immunogenicity endpoint [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]31 , but NAb against VOCs have not been evaluated. Although we found good concordance between the presence of anti-S1 IgG antibodies and NAbT against WT SARS-CoV-2 in our cohort (in line with reports in those without cancer) [34][35][36] , seroconversion was a poorer surrogate for NAbT against VOCs, where approximately half the patients without detectable NAb against Delta had anti-S1 IgG antibodies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that cancer or its treatment may impact immunity, characterisation of immune response to COVID-19 vaccines in cancer patients represents a priority. Available studies demonstrated generally high seroconversion rates after two vaccine doses in patients with solid cancers (≥90%, measured as IgG), [14][15][16][17] with less pronounced responses in those with haematological malignancies (compounded by treatments including anti-CD20 therapy) 14,[18][19][20][21][22][23] . However, data on the functionally relevant SARS-CoV-2 neutralising antibody responses, particularly to VOC, are scarce.…”
CAPTURE (NCT03226886) is a prospective cohort study of COVID-19 immunity in patients with cancer. Here we evaluated 585 patients following administration of two doses of BNT162b2 or AZD1222 vaccines, administered 12 weeks apart. Seroconversion rates after two doses were 85% and 59% in patients with solid and hematological malignancies, respectively. A lower proportion of patients had detectable neutralizing antibody titers (NAbT) against SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs) vs wild-type (WT). Patients with hematological malignancies were more likely to have undetectable NAbT and had lower median NAbT vs solid cancers against both WT and VOCs. In comparison with individuals without cancer, patients with haematological, but not solid, malignancies had reduced NAb responses. Seroconversion showed poor concordance with NAbT against VOCs. Prior SARS-CoV-2 infection boosted NAb response including against VOCs, and anti-CD20 treatment was associated with undetectable NAbT. Vaccine-induced T-cell responses were detected in 80% of patients, and were comparable between vaccines or cancer types. Our results have implications for the management of cancer patients during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.
“…Diminished vaccine responses have been described in patients with CLL and MM. B-cell depletion, active treatment with BTK inhibitors, and IgA deficiency have been associated with an inadequate humoral response 122 , 123 , 124 , 125 . In the largest study examining patients with HM to date, including 1455 patients, seroprotective antibodies were analyzed 14 days after the second dose of mRNA vaccine.…”
Section: Current State Of Sars-cov-2 Vaccine Responses In Patients With Hematologic Malignanciesmentioning
Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has shown unprecedented response rates in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) hematological malignancies. While CAR-T therapy renders hope to heavily pre-treated patients, the rapid commercialization and cumulative immunosuppression predispose patients to infections for a prolonged period. CAR-T poses distinctive short- and long-term toxicities and infection risks among patients who receive CAR-T after multiple prior treatments, often including hematopoietic cell transplantation. The acute toxicities include cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome. The long-term B-cell depletion, hypogammaglobulinemia, and cytopenia further predispose patients to severe infections and abrogate the remission success achieved by the living drug. These on-target-off-tumor toxicities deplete B-cells across the entire lineage and further diminish immune responses to vaccines. Early observational data suggest that patients with hematologic malignancies may not mount an adequate humoral and cellular response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. In this review, we summarize the immune comprising factors indigenous to CAR-T recipients. We discuss the immunogenic potential of different SARS-CoV-2 vaccines based on the differences in the manufacturing platforms among CAR-T recipients. Given the lack of data related to the safety and efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in this distinctively immunosuppressed cohort, we summarize the infection risks associated with FDA-approved CAR-T constructs and the potential determinants of vaccine responses. The review further highlights the potential need for booster vaccine dosing and the promise for heterologous prime-boosting in CAR-T recipients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.