2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2005.01.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antibody microarrays for native toxin detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
47
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The remaining replicates can be used to assess the apparent affinity of each antibody captured on the microarrays for a particular antigen. A binding curve for the antibodies produced by each cell can be constructed by applying a series of concentrations of antigen (e.g., 10 pM-100 nM) to the set of replicate microarrays and then measuring the fluorescent intensities of captured antigen as a function of concentration (13). Variations in the rates of secretion among cells or in the efficiency of capture among glass slides can affect the amount of antibody captured from each cell on each replicate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remaining replicates can be used to assess the apparent affinity of each antibody captured on the microarrays for a particular antigen. A binding curve for the antibodies produced by each cell can be constructed by applying a series of concentrations of antigen (e.g., 10 pM-100 nM) to the set of replicate microarrays and then measuring the fluorescent intensities of captured antigen as a function of concentration (13). Variations in the rates of secretion among cells or in the efficiency of capture among glass slides can affect the amount of antibody captured from each cell on each replicate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PA has been previously detected in the serum of infected guinea pigs and rabbits after signs of toxemia are observed using sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis/Western methods (15,37), yet without any detection limits reported. More recently, a microarray was engineered to detect unlabeled native toxin (40). Although the reported limit of detection for PA was 1.3 g/ml, there exists potential in expanding upon immunoassays for toxin detection for infected hosts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, classic CT determinations require the use of either animal methods (5,6) or tissue culture methods (7,8), which are also time-consuming and are subjective in the interpretation of results. Efforts have been made recently to develop more-sensitive methods, including enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (9), latex agglutination assays (10), coagglutination assays (5), liposome-based assays (9,11), radioimmunoassays (12), hydrogel-based immunoassays (13), monosaccharide-and antibody array-based assays (14)(15)(16)(17), PCR-based molecular assays (10,(18)(19)(20)(21), and biosensor-based assays (22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31). A reliable laboratory tool is desirable for clinical services and epidemiological investigation, to characterize CT activities rapidly and quantitatively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%