2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2016.07.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antibody-drug conjugate characterization by chromatographic and electrophoretic techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
0
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two levels of heterogeneity are characterized: (1) The antibody contains species conjugated with different number of payloads, or (2) an antibody with the same number of payloads may have different conjugation sites. 9 Conventional conjugation strategies include conjugation to surface lysine residues or the interchain cysteines ( Fig. 1).…”
Section: Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Two levels of heterogeneity are characterized: (1) The antibody contains species conjugated with different number of payloads, or (2) an antibody with the same number of payloads may have different conjugation sites. 9 Conventional conjugation strategies include conjugation to surface lysine residues or the interchain cysteines ( Fig. 1).…”
Section: Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 In addition, the analytical characterization to evaluate physical and chemical integrity can be of increased complexity, 8 particularly in quantification of free drug, total drug, drug-to-antibody ratio (DAR), and drug load distribution. 9 Chemical and physical degradation pathways of biologics and chemical entities have been extensively investigated. Antibody-drug conjugates bear degradation pathways of their 3 components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3A, second panel), but a lower recovery of the LC and the Fd glycovariants to 39% and 62% was observed at 40 • C. Brentuximab vedotin has several highly hydrophobic loaded fragments due to cytotoxic drugs attached to them (LC I, Fd I, Fd II and Fd III fragments, with I, II and III corresponding to the number of bound payloads). The proper recovery of these loaded subunits is important for the estimation of the average drug-to-antibody ratio (DAR), which is a critical quality attribute (CQA) of the antibody drug conjugates [31,[42][43][44]. Average DAR can be calculated based on the formula reported by Wagner-Rousset et al [45] and it is generally close to 4.0 [46,47].…”
Section: Recovery Of Mab Species In Hilic Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst much work has been done to control the regioselectivity of the covalent attachment of drug molecules onto the antibodies and new modes of drugrelease, [12][13][14][15] little attention has been paid to ADC-analyses until recently. Recent publications described both novel techniques for the assessment of the drug-to-antibody ratio (DAR), [16][17][18][19][20][21] ADC stability, [22][23][24][25] aggregation degree assessment, [26][27][28] bioanalysis, 29 the quantification of unconjugated drug molecules 22 and PTMs. 8,[30][31][32] There exist numerous reviews discussing ADC analysis techniques by comparing data from different studies; 27,[33][34][35] however, to our knowledge comprehensive studies that have experimentally compared the performance of multiple techniques for ADC DAR analysis based on a single sample batch are scarce.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%