2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104748
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antibodies against Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae, Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and influenza virus and their relationships with risk factors, clinical signs and lung lesions in pig farms with one-site production systems in Brazil

Abstract: A study was conducted on 21 pig herds using one-site production system in the southeast region of Brazil to assess the relationships among serological results for primary pathogens involved in respiratory diseases (Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae, App; Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae, Mhyo; and swine influenza virus, SIV), cough index, pneumonia index, pleuritis and herd characteristics. The prevalence of antibodies against Mhyo and SIV increased throughout the raising phases, with the highest prevalence in slaughter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, vaccine protection against clinical pneumonia is incomplete because a commercial vaccine does not prevent colonization. The number of seropositive pigs gradually increased until end of the fi nishing period, indicating that M. hyopneumoniae may continue the circulation in vaccinated animals and cause active infection [8]. Poor management and safety measures are important factors that may cause secondary infections with other pathogens, resulting in further economic losses [12,13].…”
Section: Mycoplasma Hyopneumoniaementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, vaccine protection against clinical pneumonia is incomplete because a commercial vaccine does not prevent colonization. The number of seropositive pigs gradually increased until end of the fi nishing period, indicating that M. hyopneumoniae may continue the circulation in vaccinated animals and cause active infection [8]. Poor management and safety measures are important factors that may cause secondary infections with other pathogens, resulting in further economic losses [12,13].…”
Section: Mycoplasma Hyopneumoniaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that the respiratory diseases of swine have multifactorial causes resulting from interactions among different etiological agents, environmental conditions and management practices [4,7,8]. The list of infectious agents that cause respiratory diseases in swine is extensive and includes both, bacterial and viral pathogens [9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lateral transmission occurs by pig-to-pig contact between infected and susceptible animals. An effective way to reduce disease spread is the implementation of strict all-in/all-out (AIAO) management practices [24,25]. In true AIAO systems, pigs are closely matched by age and move forward through the production stages in the same groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, implementation of strict AIAO practices is di cult in farrow-to-nish farms as the majority lack facilities exclusively dedicated to pull outs (i.e. slow-growing and/or sick pigs) and pigs are often regrouped at various times according to their body weight [3], in an effort to achieve uniformity in slaughter weight [24]. This results in creating, perhaps inadvertently, several "production ows" increasing the likelihood of disease transmission between pigs of different age groups [3] with mixed immune status [27], within and between ows and extending to subsequent farrowing batches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…slow-growing and/or sick pigs). Pigs are often regrouped at various times according to their body weight [2], in an effort to achieve uniformity in slaughter weight [16]. This results in creating, perhaps inadvertently, several "production ows" increasing the likelihood of disease transmission between pigs of different age groups [2] with mixed immune status [19], within and between ows and extending to subsequent farrowing batches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%