2010
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.2009.198523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antibiotics-impregnated ventricular catheter versus systemic antibiotics for prevention of nosocomial CSF and non-CSF infections: a prospective randomised clinical trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
45
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean duration of drainage was 9.9 and 10.1 days respectively and did not vary between both groups. No ventriculostomy-related infections were noted in their series [20,21]. Similarly, our results did not find any infection prior to 9 days of drainage and more than 70% occurred after more than 14 days of drainage.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 45%
“…The mean duration of drainage was 9.9 and 10.1 days respectively and did not vary between both groups. No ventriculostomy-related infections were noted in their series [20,21]. Similarly, our results did not find any infection prior to 9 days of drainage and more than 70% occurred after more than 14 days of drainage.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 45%
“…6 In recent years, antibiotic-impregnated EVD catheters have been introduced in an attempt to reduce the risk of ventriculitis arising from catheter colonization. 10,[21][22][23] Although these new catheters have been reported to be successful in this respect, a recent study 18 raised concern that antimicrobial agents leaching from the catheters might inhibit or kill bacteria in CSF samples, thus producing falsenegative laboratory cultures and masking cases of ventriculitis, thereby interfering with or delaying treatment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RCT study by Zabramski et al 23 revealed a statistically significant benefit of AI-EVD catheters. However, the remaining 2 RCTs conducted by Wong et al 19 and Pople et al 20 did not reveal any benefit. A random model was used because of moderate heterogeneity (c 2 ¼ 3.14; P ¼ .21; I 2 ¼ 36%), and a pooled analysis of these RCTs showed no significant difference between the 2 groups (RR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.11-1.15; P ¼ .09) (Fig 5A).…”
Section: Ai-evd Vs Plain Evd Cathetersmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Two observational studies were performed in children, 18,26 and the pooled data showed no significant difference (RR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.03-2.08; P ¼ . 19). Five studies were conducted in children and in adult populations.…”
Section: Ai-evd Vs Plain Evd Cathetersmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation