2020
DOI: 10.1590/1678-9199-jvatitd-2019-0098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antibiotic therapy for snakebite envenoming

Abstract: There are numerous conflicting recommendations available on the use of antibiotics following snakebite. The present letter to the editor presents some recommendations based on recent studies, and aims to stimulate debate on this topic.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, resistance to antibiotics in bacteria found in infections of snakebite patients ( López et al, 2008 ; Sachett et al, 2017 ) opens the debate on whether antibiotic treatment should be supplemented prophylactically, or whether instead, the infection should be confirmed first and antibiotic resistance testing requested in all cases before trying antibiotics ( Tagwireyi et al, 2001 ; Wagener et al, 2017 ). The prophylactic use of antibiotics has been recommended in cases when (a) there is objective evidence of infection, or (b) there is marked local tissue damage, which greatly favors infection ( Resiere et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, resistance to antibiotics in bacteria found in infections of snakebite patients ( López et al, 2008 ; Sachett et al, 2017 ) opens the debate on whether antibiotic treatment should be supplemented prophylactically, or whether instead, the infection should be confirmed first and antibiotic resistance testing requested in all cases before trying antibiotics ( Tagwireyi et al, 2001 ; Wagener et al, 2017 ). The prophylactic use of antibiotics has been recommended in cases when (a) there is objective evidence of infection, or (b) there is marked local tissue damage, which greatly favors infection ( Resiere et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consisting of immunoglobulins purified from hyperimmunized ovine or equine plasma/serum, these products save thousands of lives each year, but are associated with a number of therapeutic challenges, including limited cross-snake species efficacies, poor safety profiles and, for many snakebite victims residing in remote rural areas in developing countries, unacceptable issues with affordability and accessibility [17]. Small molecule toxin inhibitors are regarded as promising candidates for the development of affordable broad-spectrum snakebite treatments, as these can block the enzymatic activities of venoms [18][19][20]. Varespladib, an indole-based nonspecific pan-secretory PLA 2 inhibitor has been studied extensively for repurposing for snakebite.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although current snakebite treatments, known as antivenoms (equine/ovine polyclonal antibodies), can be effective therapies capable of reducing morbidity and mortality, they have many limitations associated with them, leaving a critical therapeutic gap between snakebite and effective treatment [6,12]. Small molecule toxin inhibitor-based approaches are gaining much traction as promising alternatives and/or complementary treatments for snakebite [12][13][14][15][16], as they show a number of characteristics desirable for use as either early prehospital or adjunct therapies [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%