2016
DOI: 10.11599/germs.2016.1087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antibiotic susceptibility patterns of aerobic bacterial strains isolated from patients with burn wound infections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the contrary, the antimicrobial drugs that were found to be most active were amikacin and imipenem against Gram-negative species and vancomycin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole versus Gram-positives. The efficacy of amikacin, vancomycin and imipenem was reported also in other studies [15]. Several studies, reported in literature, confirmed our results demonstrating that vancomycin appears to be the most effective antibiotic towards Gram-positive bacteria [36,41,44,49].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the contrary, the antimicrobial drugs that were found to be most active were amikacin and imipenem against Gram-negative species and vancomycin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole versus Gram-positives. The efficacy of amikacin, vancomycin and imipenem was reported also in other studies [15]. Several studies, reported in literature, confirmed our results demonstrating that vancomycin appears to be the most effective antibiotic towards Gram-positive bacteria [36,41,44,49].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The detection of microbial species, pathogens distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns are important aspects, often underestimated, in order to limit the spread of antibiotic-resistant isolates. In particular, the detection of the different microbial species colonizing a wound, as well as their susceptibility to the antimicrobials, can provide an indication for a more appropriate therapy to be administered to patients, significantly reducing the health care costs [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In present study, P. aeruginosa isolates were mostly resistant against piperacillin (93.3%), ceftriaxone (93.3%), and aztreonam (86.7%). These findings are similar to other studies performed in Iran [ 4 , 5 ]. Salimi et al reported that many isolates of P. aeruginosa collected from burn patients referred to Mottahari hospital in Tehran province were resistant to used antibiotics, ceftizoxime (87%), aztreonam (80.2%), kanamycin (79.4%), and ceftazidime (74.8%) [ 6 ].…”
supporting
confidence: 93%
“…29 Other burn centres in Australia, Iran, Singapore and Turkey have also documented similar results with Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii being the most common pathogens responsible for burn wound infections. [30][31][32][33][34] Gram-negative pathogens (Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Escherichia Coli, Enterobacter spp. and Proteus spp.)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%