2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2006.02.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antibiotic prescribing in Australian general practice: How has it changed from 1990–91 to 2002–03?

Abstract: There is increasing evidence that antibiotics have limited value for many respiratory illnesses. This study investigates changes in overall antibiotic prescribing rates, and rates for specific conditions, by Australian general practitioners (GPs) between 1990-91 and 2002-03. This is a comparative study of two cross-sectional surveys of general practice activity, the Australian Morbidity and Treatment Survey (AMTS) 1990-91 and Bettering Evaluation and Care of Health (BEACH) 2002-03. Both studies used random sam… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common illnesses for which children were treated by GPs in this study were asthma, upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs), allergies and conjunctivitis, similar to previous reports [1]. Despite evidence of the limited effects of antibiotics in conditions such as URTIs, sinusitis and otitis media [32], these appeared to be commonly used and interestingly, the majority of harm reported in the survey was due to antibiotic adverse effects. This highlights that further investigations of these issues in populations studies is imperative to improve how medicines are used safely and effectively in children.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The most common illnesses for which children were treated by GPs in this study were asthma, upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs), allergies and conjunctivitis, similar to previous reports [1]. Despite evidence of the limited effects of antibiotics in conditions such as URTIs, sinusitis and otitis media [32], these appeared to be commonly used and interestingly, the majority of harm reported in the survey was due to antibiotic adverse effects. This highlights that further investigations of these issues in populations studies is imperative to improve how medicines are used safely and effectively in children.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Although children under 2 years of age with bilateral AOM or otorrhoea are most likely to benefit from antibiotic treatment, subgroups of children most likely to benefit from surgery for chronic OME have not yet been identified 19 , 20 . Despite the ready availability of high‐quality evidence, studies suggest that there has been no reduction in active treatment strategies used by Australian doctors 21 , 22 …”
Section: Important Research Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treatment guidelines recommend avoiding the use of antibiotics in most respiratory tract infections to limit adverse drug reactions and bacterial resistance [10]. Antibiotic overuse and misuse in Australia has been offset by various consumer educational campaigns which began in 2000 [11] and there was a decline in the frequency of antibiotic prescriptions dispensed in community pharmacies between 1998 and 2002; however, the decline was greater among children than adults [12]. The campaigns were run by the Australian National Prescribing Service (NPS) Medicinewise and have received international attention; topics include the ''Common Colds Need Common Sense, They Don't Need Antibiotics'' campaign (2004) which was disseminated via TV, print and radio, and the ''Resistance Fighter'' campaign in 2012 which used social media sites such as Facebook [2,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%