2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.09.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antibiotic Impregnated External Ventricular Drains: Meta and Cost Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(54 reference statements)
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[8] For this study, uniformity of collected data was paramount, and thus all ventriculostomy catheters included here were non-antibiotic impregnated Integra trauma catheters. [7151623] After the EVD has been sutured into place, a BioPatch is placed where the catheter exits the skin and a Tegaderm is placed to cover the BioPatch and catheter. As per standard neurosurgical protocol, a non-contrast Computerized Tomography (CT) scan was obtained after placement to rule out hemorrhage caused by placement and to confirm satisfactory placement of the catheter.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8] For this study, uniformity of collected data was paramount, and thus all ventriculostomy catheters included here were non-antibiotic impregnated Integra trauma catheters. [7151623] After the EVD has been sutured into place, a BioPatch is placed where the catheter exits the skin and a Tegaderm is placed to cover the BioPatch and catheter. As per standard neurosurgical protocol, a non-contrast Computerized Tomography (CT) scan was obtained after placement to rule out hemorrhage caused by placement and to confirm satisfactory placement of the catheter.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…52 A recent meta-analysis showed a significant protective effect of antibiotic-impregnated EVDs against infections, with a number needed to treat of 19. 53 Other studies show a selective effect (silver-impregnated EVD catheters were shown to decrease the risk of CSF infections but only by Gram-positive organisms 54 ), or no effect at all (silver-coated catheters did not reduce days with antibiotics, days with EVD, or days in the ICU 39 ). Cost analysis studies have demonstrated that use of the more expensive impregnated catheters is supported.…”
Section: Prophylaxismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complications associated with VPS failures are expensive to manage. [32][33][34][35][36][37][38] Consequently, the use of VPS catheters, which result in fewer complications, even if more expensive to purchase, could be costeffective or yield cost savings to the NHS. The economic analysis within the BASICS trial estimated that, although antibiotic-impregnated shunt catheters are about twice the price of standard silicone shunt catheters, this upfront cost could be justified by the reduced infection rate and associated cost savings of further surgery and prolonged hospital care.…”
Section: Cost Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analyses that considered the RR of VPS infection associated with antibioticimpregnated shunt catheters, determined from clinical trial data, are limited to three studies. [37][38][39] Root et al 37 All analyses have many limitations, not least the assumption that potential avoidance of the cost of managing VPS infections can be equated to a cost saving. Moreover, the analyses lacked any consideration of health outcomes associated with shunt catheter-associated infections or other potential causes of VPS failure.…”
Section: Chapter 4 Economic Evaluation Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%