Antibacterial surface properties of fluoride-containing resin-based sealants

Naorungroj, Supawadee; Wei, Hong; Arnold, Roland R.; Swift, Edward J.; Walter, Ricardo

doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2010.01.005

Cited by 36 publications

(40 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This could have contributed to the low caries incidence. 40 However, the occurrence of dental caries, if any, beneath the sealants could not be detected due to the A limitation of this study is that routine clinical examination was insufficient to diagnose opacity of the two materials. Teeth sealed very early after eruption require frequent reapplication of the fissure sealant, than teeth sealed later.…”

Section: Retention Criteriamentioning

confidence: 85%

Evaluation of glass carbomer sealant and a moisture tolerant resin sealant – A comparative study

Subramaniam

Jayasurya

Babu

2015

International Journal of Dental Science and Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Retention Criteriamentioning

confidence: 85%

Evaluation of glass carbomer sealant and a moisture tolerant resin sealant – A comparative study

Subramaniam

Jayasurya

Babu

2015

International Journal of Dental Science and Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…9 The recently available Clinpro TM XT (3M ESPE, Minnesota, USA) is a new paste-liquid that may be used as a site-specific, light-cured desensitizing agent. 10,11,12,13 Ion exchange with dental substrate inherent to GICs enhanced the development of these materials to obtain high fluoride release. 14 Since GICs may also release therapeutic doses of fluoride over time, the activity is an important feature to obstruct tubules in DH treatment.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of dentin hypersensitivity treatment with glass ionomer cements: A randomized clinical trial

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A randomized, double-blind, split-mouth clinical trial was performed compared the desensitizing efficacy of the resin-modified glass ionomer cement (GIC) ClinproTM XT (3M ESPE, Minnesota, USA) and the conventional GIC Vidrion R (SS White, Gloucester, UK) in a 6-month follow-up. Subjects were required to have at least two teeth with dentin hypersensitivity. Teeth were divided at random into 2 groups, one group received Clinpro XT and the other conventional GIC Vidrion R. Treatments were assessed by tactile and air blast tests using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at baseline, after 20 minutes, and at 7, 15, 21, 30, 90 and 180 days post-treatment. Twenty subjects (152 teeth) were included. Both tests (tactile and air blast) showed a significant reduction of dentin hypersensitivity immediately after the application of Vidrion R and Clinpro XT (20 min). VAS scores obtained along the 6-month follow-up were statistically lower when compared to initial rates (p < 0.05). Both GIC were able to reduce dentin hypersensitivity up to 6-month post-treatment period without statistically significant differences among them (p > 0.05). Both cements provided satisfactory results in long-term dental sensitivity reduction.

show abstract

“…[7][8][9][10][11][12] The incorporation of fluoride into dental materials has been shown to inhibit the growth of relevant bacteria. 12,13 Moreover, such materials can be ''recharged'' with fluoride, 14 and the continuous presence of even low concentrations of fluoride in the fluid phase surrounding the teeth is considered to confer significant cariostatic benefits. 15,16 The use of oral care products containing fluoridated actives such as sodium fluoride (NaF), amine fluoride (AmF 2 ) and stannous fluoride (SnF 2 ) result in elevated fluoride concentrations both in saliva and plaque fluid for up to several hours.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%