2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.07.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antibacterial prophylaxis for gram-positive and gram-negative infections in cranial surgery: A meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason for this finding may be the greater use of antibiotic therapies with prophylactic purposes in these units to prevent postoperative infections. Although beneficial, this practice is controversial as preventive antibiotic therapy may favor the promotion of antibiotic-resistant strains of bacteria (44,45). On the other hand, also COL patients discharged from ICU reported high percentages of antibiotic use during ICU stay, confirming literature evidences about the strict relationship between antibiotic use and microbial resistance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The reason for this finding may be the greater use of antibiotic therapies with prophylactic purposes in these units to prevent postoperative infections. Although beneficial, this practice is controversial as preventive antibiotic therapy may favor the promotion of antibiotic-resistant strains of bacteria (44,45). On the other hand, also COL patients discharged from ICU reported high percentages of antibiotic use during ICU stay, confirming literature evidences about the strict relationship between antibiotic use and microbial resistance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…El uso de antibiótico profiláctico sistémico es controversial; sin embargo, la evidencia actual halla un efecto benéfico de su administración con la reducción de las tasas de infección postoperatoria, que varía desde un 20 % hasta un 50 % (43) . Igualmente, sugiere la fuga de LCR como el principal factor de riesgo para la infección, por lo que si persiste por más de 7 días debería considerarse el manejo quirúrgico (31,(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(49)(50)(51) . En intervenciones quirúrgicas como el drenaje ventricular externo se requiere ampliar la evidencia, especialmente en sí es útil la administración continúa hasta el retiro del catéter (31,49) .…”
Section: Antibióticos Sistémicos Profilácticosunclassified
“…Los regímenes de antibióticos usados en los diferentes estudios no son homogéneos. Dentro de estos, se incluyen el uso de vancomicina, oxacilina, clindamicina, cefazolina, trimetoprim sulfametoxazol, ampicilina y cefalosporinas de tercera generación, los cuales cumplen fundamentalmente con el cubrimiento de microorganismos grampositivos, teniendo en cuenta que el principal agente involucrado es el Staphylococcus spp (31,(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(49)(50)(51)(52)53) . Algunos estudios han favorecido el uso de vancomicina, especialmente en contextos de alta prevalencia de SAMR, pero otros no han encontrado diferencias entre esquemas (53,54,55) .…”
Section: Antibióticos Sistémicos Profilácticosunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7,[10][11][12][13][14] Due to increasing rates of SSI caused by multiresistant bacteria, use of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis is highly debated. Recent data showed that lincosamides, glycopeptides, third-generation cephalosporins, other combinations of prophylactic antibiotics, or antibiotics in the penicillin family alone are better prophylaxis against SSI than firstgeneration cephalosporins among neurosurgical patients, 15 indicating a need to cover multiresistant and gram-negative bacteria. The use of vancomycin is still controversial because of its adverse effects and increasing rates of vancomycinresistant enterococci.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%