2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.phymed.2007.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antibacterial effect of some essential oils administered alone or in combination with Norfloxacin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
108
2
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 231 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
11
108
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Results found in this study are in accordance with reports that have shown MIC of thyme oil against B. thermosphacta was 10-fold lower than the MIC of rosemary oil [47]. The antimicrobial activity of the EO of R. officinalis L. studied in this work may also be attributed to the dominant presence of 1,8-cineole, which has been found to have relatively strong antimicrobial properties against many important pathogens [48]; however, there are some contradictory reports on the role of 1,8-cineole and the compounds camphor, α-pinene, and p-cymene, also found in reasonably high content in the R. officinalis L. EO assayed in this survey. It is difficult to attribute the activity of a complex mixture to a single or particular constituent; thus, a higher concentration of the major component does not necessarily mean the best antimicrobial effects for most of the strains assayed [49], and possible synergistic and/or antagonistic effects of compounds in the oil should also be given consideration.…”
Section: Antimicrobial Activitysupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Results found in this study are in accordance with reports that have shown MIC of thyme oil against B. thermosphacta was 10-fold lower than the MIC of rosemary oil [47]. The antimicrobial activity of the EO of R. officinalis L. studied in this work may also be attributed to the dominant presence of 1,8-cineole, which has been found to have relatively strong antimicrobial properties against many important pathogens [48]; however, there are some contradictory reports on the role of 1,8-cineole and the compounds camphor, α-pinene, and p-cymene, also found in reasonably high content in the R. officinalis L. EO assayed in this survey. It is difficult to attribute the activity of a complex mixture to a single or particular constituent; thus, a higher concentration of the major component does not necessarily mean the best antimicrobial effects for most of the strains assayed [49], and possible synergistic and/or antagonistic effects of compounds in the oil should also be given consideration.…”
Section: Antimicrobial Activitysupporting
confidence: 92%
“…On the other hand, Hammer et al (1999) analyzed the essential oils effects on Escherichia coli, and found MIC values similar to our results (clove 0.25, rosemary 0.9 /100 mL) (Hammer et al, 1999). Rosato et al (2007) reported MIC of Rosmarinus officinalis against Staphylococcus aureus was 1.40-11.20 mg/mL (Rosato, Vitali, De Laurentis, Armenise and Antonietta, 2007). MIC/MICs of Rosemary EOs against Escherichia coli were 4.5 − 10 (µL/mL), against Staphylococcus aureus were 0.4 − 10 (µL/mL) (Hammer et al, 1999;Farag et al, 1989;Smith-Palmer et al, 1998;Pintore et al, …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…It will also be of great interest to determine the combined effects of isoprenoids and antibiotics, as has been reported by others [34][35][36].…”
Section: Discussion When We Compared the Isoprenoids' Effects Againstmentioning
confidence: 82%