2005
DOI: 10.2165/00151829-200504001-00005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antibacterial Drivers of Resistance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clarithromycin was chosen because, when compared with other macrolides, it is preferentially concentrated in the lung epithelial lining fluid (28, 29), it may be less likely to contribute to antimicrobial resistance than other members of the macrolide family (30, 31), its side effect profile with extended treatment period has been described (32, 33), it is unlikely to significantly alter fluticasone pharmacokinetics (34), and it has been previously used in asthma (7). However, it is possible that the antimicrobial or anti-inflammatory effects might have been greater had another member of the macrolide class been chosen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clarithromycin was chosen because, when compared with other macrolides, it is preferentially concentrated in the lung epithelial lining fluid (28, 29), it may be less likely to contribute to antimicrobial resistance than other members of the macrolide family (30, 31), its side effect profile with extended treatment period has been described (32, 33), it is unlikely to significantly alter fluticasone pharmacokinetics (34), and it has been previously used in asthma (7). However, it is possible that the antimicrobial or anti-inflammatory effects might have been greater had another member of the macrolide class been chosen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%