2023
DOI: 10.3390/nano13162294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antibacterial Cu or Zn-MOFs Based on the 1,3,5-Tris-(styryl)benzene Tricarboxylate

Sorraya Najma Kinza Lelouche,
Laura Albentosa-González,
Pilar Clemente-Casares
et al.

Abstract: Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) are highly versatile materials. Here, two novel MOFs, branded as IEF-23 and IEF-24 and based on an antibacterial tricarboxylate linker and zinc or copper cations, and holding antibacterial properties, are presented. The materials were synthesized by the solvothermal route and fully characterized. The antibacterial activity of IEF-23 and IEF-24 was investigated against Staphylococcus epidermidis and Escherichia coli via the agar diffusion method. These bacteria are some of the mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The OD values of the experimental group were significantly lower than those of the control group, indicating that the two materials significantly inhibited the growth of both bacteria at each test point. The results reflect the broad-spectrum antibacterial properties of the two materials [42,43]. Zn(NO 3 ) 2 •6H 2 O (10.1 mg, 0.034 mmol), 1,4-bpeb (4.8 mg, 0.017 mmol), IPA (2.8 mg, 0.017 mmol), 3 mL DMSO, and 1 mL MeOH were placed in a 10 mL glass bottle with 1 mL 0.1 mM aqueous KOH solution.…”
Section: Antibacterial Properties Of Mof-1 and Mof-2supporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The OD values of the experimental group were significantly lower than those of the control group, indicating that the two materials significantly inhibited the growth of both bacteria at each test point. The results reflect the broad-spectrum antibacterial properties of the two materials [42,43]. Zn(NO 3 ) 2 •6H 2 O (10.1 mg, 0.034 mmol), 1,4-bpeb (4.8 mg, 0.017 mmol), IPA (2.8 mg, 0.017 mmol), 3 mL DMSO, and 1 mL MeOH were placed in a 10 mL glass bottle with 1 mL 0.1 mM aqueous KOH solution.…”
Section: Antibacterial Properties Of Mof-1 and Mof-2supporting
confidence: 54%
“…The OD values of the experimental group were significantly lower than those of the control group, indicating that the two materials significantly inhibited the growth of both bacteria at each test point. The results reflect the broad-spectrum antibacterial properties of the two materials [42,43]. In addition, the minimum inhibitory concentration and inhibitory dynamic curve were investigated; the minimum inhibitory concentrations of MOF-1 against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus were 19.52 µg/mL and 39.06 µg/mL, respectively.…”
Section: Antibacterial Properties Of Mof-1 and Mof-2mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…There is also an increasing number of Cu-MOFs being tested and used for their antimicrobial activity. 9–11 A well-known representative is [Cu 3 (BTC) 2 ] n (H 3 BTC = 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid), commonly known as Cu-HKUST-1 or MOF-199, which has remarkable antibacterial activity against S. aureus and E. coli. 11–15 The progressive degradation of Cu-MOFs and the leaching of Cu 2+ ions as well as the ligand, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%