2012
DOI: 10.1038/ja.2012.59
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antibacterial activity of amphiphilic tobramycin

Abstract: Amphiphilic aminoglycoside antimicrobials are an emerging class of new antibacterial agents with novel modes of action. Previous studies have shown that amphiphilic neomycin-B and kanamycin-A analogs restore potent antibacterial activity against Gram-positive neomycin-B-and kanamycin-A-resistant organisms. In this paper, we investigated the antibacterial properties of a series of amphiphilic tobramycin analogs. We prepared tobramycin-lipid conjugates, as well as tobramycin-peptide triazole conjugates, and stud… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These initial observations were expanded in subsequent reports revealing enhanced antibacterial activities with attachment of alkyl and other hydrophobic moieties to neamine, 8,10,13 paromomycin, 7,9,13 and tobramycin. 11,12 These new discoveries with antibacterial amphiphilic aminoglycosides immediately raise questions about their mechanisms of action, and (not surprisingly) interactions with cell surface membranes are implicated. Several observations indicate membrane perturbation as the primary antibacterial action of these compounds and not ribosome interaction to cause protein translation misreading.…”
Section: Amphiphilic Aminoglycosidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These initial observations were expanded in subsequent reports revealing enhanced antibacterial activities with attachment of alkyl and other hydrophobic moieties to neamine, 8,10,13 paromomycin, 7,9,13 and tobramycin. 11,12 These new discoveries with antibacterial amphiphilic aminoglycosides immediately raise questions about their mechanisms of action, and (not surprisingly) interactions with cell surface membranes are implicated. Several observations indicate membrane perturbation as the primary antibacterial action of these compounds and not ribosome interaction to cause protein translation misreading.…”
Section: Amphiphilic Aminoglycosidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17,18 Importantly, although AMP killing activity is typically lower than that of aminoglycosides, their membrane activity depends less on the metabolic status of the cell. 19 Previous work has shown that tobramycin can retain good activity after conjugation to lipid tails, 20,21 and there are a few examples of composite molecules with dual antimicrobial effect. 22 However, there is no general methodology for combining two distinct antimicrobial functions into a single molecule without mutual interference.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reaction mixture was then concentrated in vacuo and subjected to column chromatography on silica gel (DCM/MeOH 95:2/95:5) to afford compound 3 as a white amorphous solid (19 mg, 33% yield). NH I ), 6.46 (1H, d, J¼6.6 Hz, NH II ), 5.52 (1H, d, J¼3.6 Hz, H 1III ), 5.50 (1H,d,J¼3.7 Hz,H 1I ),4.89 (1H,dd,J¼2.4,11.8 Hz,H 6III ),4.79 (1H,dd,J¼11.8,4.8 Hz,H 6 0 III ),4.67 (1H,ddd,J¼2.4,4.7,7.5 Hz,H 5III ),4.37 (1H,ddd,J¼7.5,7.5,10.2 Hz,H 3III ),4.26 (1H,ddd,J¼4.4,4.4,9. 13 Hz, H 2II eq), 2.60 (1H, ddd, J¼4.5, 4.5, 12 Hz, H 3I eq), 2.52 (2H, t, J¼7.4 Hz, eCOCH 2 , H 2 0 ), 2.23 (1H, m, H 3I ax), 1.96 (1H, m, H 2II ax), 1.77 (2H, tt, J¼7 Hz, H 3 0 ), 1.63e1.53 (5Â s, COC(CH 3 ) 3 ) 1.40e1.33 (br m, H 4 0 -H 11 0 ) 0.96 (m, H 12 0 ). 13 C { 1 H} NMR (100 MHz, pyridine-d 5 , 298K): d 173.6 (COO), 158.0e156.1 (5Â Boc C]O), 99.7 (C 1III , C 1I ), 83.4 (C 6II , C 4II ), 78.8e78.3 (5Â Boc C q ), 75.9 (C 5II ), 73.7 (C 5I ), 72.2 (C 5III ), 71.5(C 2III ), 69.3 (C 4III ), 65.9 (C 4I ), 64.0 (C 6III ), 57.8 (C 3III ), 51.0e50.7 (C 1II , C 3II , C 2I ), 42.0 (C 6I ), 35.9 (C 2II ), 34.6 (C 3I ), 34.3 (C 2 0 ), 32.1 (C 10 0 ), 29.9e29.5 (C 4 0 -C 9 0 ), 28.5 (5Â Boc (CH 3 ) 3 ), 25.3 (C 3 0 ), 23.0 (C 11 0 ), 14.3 (C 12 0 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%