2020
DOI: 10.26442/00403660.2020.11.000872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anti-viral activity of enisamium iodide against viruses of influenza and ARVI’s on different cell lines

Abstract: Influenza and ARVI represent the most numerous and dangerous group of causative agents of respiratory infections human. Aim. Characterization of the antiviral properties of enisamium iodide against human respiratory viruses in in vitro experiments. Materials and methods. In the course of experiments, the cytotoxic properties of enisamium iodide were studied against the cell lines Vero, MA-104, A549, L-41 and HEp-2. The antiviral activity of enisamium iodide was studied using virus yield reduction a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(20 reference statements)
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, unlike remdesivir, enisamium does not require intravenous administration, which would be advantageous for its use outside a hospital setting. Together with observations that enisamium can inhibit other RNA virus infections, and DNA virus infections [ 17 , 18 ], these results here suggest that it can act as a broad-spectrum polymerase inhibitor in vitro.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, unlike remdesivir, enisamium does not require intravenous administration, which would be advantageous for its use outside a hospital setting. Together with observations that enisamium can inhibit other RNA virus infections, and DNA virus infections [ 17 , 18 ], these results here suggest that it can act as a broad-spectrum polymerase inhibitor in vitro.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The cells were infected with SARS-CoV-2 at multiplicity of infection 0.01 for 1 h, and compound reapplied following virus removal. At 48 h post infection, the cytopathic effect was recorded by examination of the infected cultures by light microscopy and supernatant collected to quantify virus RNA by RT-qPCR as described previously, using nsp12-specific primers 5′-GTGARATGGTCATGTGTGGCGG-3′ and 5′-CARATGTTAAASACACTATTAGCATA-3′ [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ]. Cells were fixed with acetone/methanol (40:60) and immunostained using a SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein monoclonal antibody (1:500, Sinobiological, Cat #40143-R019-100 µL).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%