2014
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd005139.pub3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for neovascular age-related macular degeneration

Abstract: Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (Review)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
296
4
23

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 352 publications
(332 citation statements)
references
References 133 publications
9
296
4
23
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar reviews have shown increased visual acuity with continued AMD intravitreal treatment and a low incidence of adverse side effects. 74,75 While some patients respond to intravitreal injection with sustained elevation of IOP, most do not even after multiple injections. [76][77][78][79][80][81][82] In our study, we performed intravitreal injection of drug-loaded NS once and observed IOPlowering effects out to 32 days (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar reviews have shown increased visual acuity with continued AMD intravitreal treatment and a low incidence of adverse side effects. 74,75 While some patients respond to intravitreal injection with sustained elevation of IOP, most do not even after multiple injections. [76][77][78][79][80][81][82] In our study, we performed intravitreal injection of drug-loaded NS once and observed IOPlowering effects out to 32 days (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Humanized antibodies that inhibit vascular endothelial growth factor have been widely used clinically over the past decade after several randomized controlled trials demonstrated their benefit in improving visual outcomes in patients with neovascular agerelated macular degeneration (nAMD). 3 However, there are several different treatment regimens for nAMD, including fixed dosing, pro re nata (PRN), and treat-and-extend.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CATT study found monthly treatments of bevacizumab not inferior to monthly ranibizumab, although ranibizumab had a greater mean decrease in central retinal thickness and bevacizumab had more serious systemic adverse events (CATT Research Group et al 2011). A Cochrane Review including 12 randomized controlled trials including 5,496 patients for AMD found no difference in mean visual acuity outcomes between ranibizumab and bevacizumab, no difference in adverse events, and a statistically significant but clinically insignificant increase in reduction in central retinal thickness (À14 μm) with ranibizumab compared to bevacizumab (Solomon et al 2014). Some disagreement also exists whether a difference in safety of bevacizumab and ranibizumab exists .…”
Section: Rvomentioning
confidence: 99%