2004
DOI: 10.1002/art.20242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anti–tumor necrosis factor α switching in rheumatoid arthritis and juvenile chronic arthritis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The published studies are open-label and noncontrolled with few patients, most of whom suffer from rheumatoid arthritis. Nevertheless, the publications agree that the switch from one anti-TNF agent to another can be useful in cases where the first anti-TNF agent is stopped due to adverse effects or where there is a primary or secondary therapeutic failure [9,10,11,12]. In rheumatoid arthritis, it seems that better results can be achieved when the reason for the change is failure during therapy (also known as the escape phenomenon) or adverse effects, more than the primary failure [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The published studies are open-label and noncontrolled with few patients, most of whom suffer from rheumatoid arthritis. Nevertheless, the publications agree that the switch from one anti-TNF agent to another can be useful in cases where the first anti-TNF agent is stopped due to adverse effects or where there is a primary or secondary therapeutic failure [9,10,11,12]. In rheumatoid arthritis, it seems that better results can be achieved when the reason for the change is failure during therapy (also known as the escape phenomenon) or adverse effects, more than the primary failure [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In individual patients, these differences may explain the differential response to the 3 agents, although there is no direct evidence to support this. Indeed, there are now numerous reports in which it has been suggested that initiating therapy with a second anti-TNF␣ agent in patients who have failed therapy with a first agent (due to lack of efficacy or because of an AE) may be beneficial and not associated with an increased rate of AEs with the second agent (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20). However, all of the studies to date have been based on small case series (the largest included only 37 patients), which makes it difficult to establish a substantive estimate of recurrent AEs and treatment inefficacy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Since that publication, a sizeable number of research articles have investigated this question, and the answers have generally been in the affirmative, implying that, yes, a switch of this type can benefit some patients. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] However, some reports reached less favourable conclusions, 17 18 and it can rightfully be asserted that none of those published studies, nor any of the many abstracts presented at international meetings on the topic, were controlled, prospective, randomised or blinded.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%