2013
DOI: 10.3182/20131120-3-fr-4045.00032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anti-Swing Nonlinear Path Tracking Controller for Helicopter Slung Load System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theorem 1. Consider the suspension cable system of the unmanned helicopter (4) with sensor faults satisfying Assumption 1, the nonlinear sensor estimator is designed as (10). If the designed function parameters L 1 (X 1 ) and L 2 (χ) are chosen to render the following inequality valid:…”
Section: Design Of Sensor Fault Estimatormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Theorem 1. Consider the suspension cable system of the unmanned helicopter (4) with sensor faults satisfying Assumption 1, the nonlinear sensor estimator is designed as (10). If the designed function parameters L 1 (X 1 ) and L 2 (χ) are chosen to render the following inequality valid:…”
Section: Design Of Sensor Fault Estimatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Complexity e corresponding design parameters of the developed antiswing control of the suspension cable system of an unmanned helicopter based on the sensor fault estimator are chosen as K 1 � I 2 , K 2 � 150I 2 , and c � 0.5. e nonlinear sensor fault estimator is designed as (10). Based on the designed sensor fault estimator, the robust antiswing control scheme is developed as (20), (26), and (30).…”
Section: Simulation Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar to the input shaping technique, control design parameters have to be determined from a linearized state-space model, where the actual time-delay needs to be modeled. Examples of successful applications are, e.g., given in [32] for container cranes or in [31,33,34] for helicopter slung load systems to actively damp the swing motion. In [24], a comparison between the usage of input shaping, delayed feedback control, and a combination of both techniques showed that the input shaping is indeed advantageous in suppressing unintended swing motions for a multibody hexrotor UAV with cable-suspended load, but also, that a delayed feedback controller pose a powerful standalone augmentation approach to address the controller capabilities (ii) and (iii).…”
Section: Literature Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, only a portion of the interconnected system is actuated ( G 1 in Figure ) while the other portion is unactuated ( G 2 in Figure ) . A motivating example for such a class of dynamical systems is a slung load system, where a helicopter is actuated with a physical connection to the load that is (generally) unactuated. In References , the dynamics of the load affect the stability and achievable performance of the overall slung load system, and the objective is to design control laws for load damping such that the slung load system remains stable and has some degree of desirable performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%