2017 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Applied Machine Intelligence and Informatics (SAMI) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/sami.2017.7880281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anti-spoofing in face recognition with liveness detection using pupil tracking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A range of processing methods has been proposed with a vast majority operating in the visible spectrum. Many algorithms use specifically tailored features, which may be heavily pertinent to the kind of attack being detected by focusing on the texture analysis [ 14 ], motion analysis [ 15 ], life sign indicators [ 16 ] and 3D properties [ 17 ], also with a variety of machine learning based methods. Detection of 3D facial masks has been addressed in several works.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A range of processing methods has been proposed with a vast majority operating in the visible spectrum. Many algorithms use specifically tailored features, which may be heavily pertinent to the kind of attack being detected by focusing on the texture analysis [ 14 ], motion analysis [ 15 ], life sign indicators [ 16 ] and 3D properties [ 17 ], also with a variety of machine learning based methods. Detection of 3D facial masks has been addressed in several works.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The execution of LFR-ELM perspective was known to be preferable within both the databases as per the juxtaposition constituted for the end. Killioglu, et.al [22] proposed a maiden elevated algorithm to take out the pupils from the eye region. An erratic flank is selected by the proposed spoofing algorithm once the umpteenth constant numbers of frames that include pupils were identified.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The movement of a certain part in the face such as a lip movement or eye blinking can be an indicator of liveness, eye state and mouth state are two main signs to be taken into consideration in life sign detection algorithms which were established in [68][69][70][71][72] respectively. A utilization of both indicators to build a robust liveness detection system was also proposed by A.Singh et al (2014) in [73].…”
Section: Life Sign Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%