2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.04.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anti-solvent co-crystallization of carbamazepine and saccharin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
42
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Disadvantages of this method are its lower performance compared to grinding that uses a solvent, as well as the large volume of solvent used. Antisolvent crystallization has been reported for the production of carbamazepine-saccharin and indomethacin-saccharin cocrystals [ 98 , 99 ]. In both studies, the construction of phase solubility diagrams was an integral part of the methodology for identifying the optimal conditions (e.g., ratio of solvent to antisolvent) for the formation of cocrystals.…”
Section: Methods Of Cocrystal Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disadvantages of this method are its lower performance compared to grinding that uses a solvent, as well as the large volume of solvent used. Antisolvent crystallization has been reported for the production of carbamazepine-saccharin and indomethacin-saccharin cocrystals [ 98 , 99 ]. In both studies, the construction of phase solubility diagrams was an integral part of the methodology for identifying the optimal conditions (e.g., ratio of solvent to antisolvent) for the formation of cocrystals.…”
Section: Methods Of Cocrystal Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improvement of dissolution profiles can be obtained by particle size reduction techniques (Choi and Park, 2017;Dizaj et al, 2015;Khadka et al, 2014;Sironi et al, 2017), crystal morphology/polymorphism modifications (Amodwala et al, 2017;Jain et al, 2017;Keraliya et al, 2010;Maghsoodi, 2015) or multicomponent A C C E P T E D M A N U S C R I P T crystals synthesis (Ross et al, 2016;Schultheiss and Newman, 2009;Yadav et al, 2009). The latter approach including bi-component cocrystallization deserves particular attention due to the variety of cocrystal preparation methods such as solvent evaporation techniques (Bag et al, 2011;Bag and Reddy, 2012;Cysewski et al, 2016;Przybyłek et al, 2016aPrzybyłek et al, , 2016b, antisolvent crystallization (Chun et al, 2014;Lee et al, 2015;Wang et al, 2013), mechanochemical co-grinding (Hasa et al, 2015;Karki et al, 2007;Li et al, 2016;Tröbs and Emmerling, 2014) or slurry methods (Apshingekar et al, 2017;Kojima et al, 2010;Takata et al, 2008). Furthermore, the variety of cocrystals formers applicable for pharmaceutical formulations offers fine tuning of physicochemical properties of new multicomponent solids ood and Rodr guez-Hornedo, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is difficult to obtain cocrystal product with high purity and good quality using the grinding method [ 15 , 16 , 17 ]. The solution method has been applied in many cases to prepare cocrystal [ 18 , 19 ]. In the solution method, the selection of solvent is very important.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%