2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2007.10.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anti-prion activity generated by a novel vaccine formulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, this report adds to the evidence that prion diseases may display an identifiable prodrome that can be clinically detected [26,27] . This may present opportunities for prophylactic therapies for individuals at risk for developing genetic prion disease [28,29] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, this report adds to the evidence that prion diseases may display an identifiable prodrome that can be clinically detected [26,27] . This may present opportunities for prophylactic therapies for individuals at risk for developing genetic prion disease [28,29] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An exciting report from White et al (2003) was the first clear evidence that passive immunization of prioninfected animals inhibits prion replication and delays development of prion disease. Following that report, a number of groups (Campana et al, 2009;Pilon et al, 2007;Song et al, 2008;Wuertzer et al, 2008) have demonstrated the effectiveness of immunization using anti-PrP antibody in delaying the onset of disease in vivo.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Additional boosts with 168 amplified the CD8 + T cell pool specific for the 168 native peptide and further prolonged clinical phase. The partial positive effect obtained with AdTA can be viewed as a classical adjuvant effect associated with non-specific immune stimulation and significant therapeutic benefits, as reported in two earlier studies (Tal et al, 2003;Pilon et al, 2007). However, the lack of protection following Ad217NP immunization, likely originating from peptide processing deficit, suggest that the prolongation of the clinical phase can be in part attributed to a peptide-related specific effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%