18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR'06) 2006
DOI: 10.1109/icpr.2006.274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anti-personnel Mine Detection and Classification Using GPR Image

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They consist in summing up intensities along A-scans within a C-scan, and thus, a surface 2-D map of potentially suspicious places is generated [1]. In [5], Bhuiyan and Nath worked with B-scans and use a seeded-growing approach for image segmentation and discovering places of interest. Marble [2] also considered B-scans and proposed a binary large objects detection technique.…”
Section: A Review Of Some Detection Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They consist in summing up intensities along A-scans within a C-scan, and thus, a surface 2-D map of potentially suspicious places is generated [1]. In [5], Bhuiyan and Nath worked with B-scans and use a seeded-growing approach for image segmentation and discovering places of interest. Marble [2] also considered B-scans and proposed a binary large objects detection technique.…”
Section: A Review Of Some Detection Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overlapping regions of 3 × 3 cells constitute blocks for the normalization (33). 5 Since the extraction is repeated for B-scans (crossing the middle of the scanning window) both across and along track, the total number of features is twice the grid size times the number of bins: n = 2 · 4 · 3 · n θ . In other words, the full vector of HOG features is a concatenation of H(c, l) values for all cells, all bins, and two B-scan orientations.…”
Section: A Hog Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gamba and Lossani [5] also used the similar method but the Neural Network aims at the target signatures that were enhanced and processed beforehand. Bhuiyan and Nath [6] differentiate target reflections using region growing approach which is constrained by the image quality. In [7], Pasolli et.al detects buried targets by localizing hyperbolic patterns using Genetic Algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For that reason, automatic target detection in GPR images can give a significant leap in the practical application of GPR. Neural Network classifier [1][5] [6] has been one of the most commonly used approach to recognize the hyperbolic signatures Al-Nuaimy et.al [1] trained a backpropagation neural network to recognize the spectral contents of signal segments of targets. Gamba and Lossani [5] also used the similar method but the Neural Network aims at the target signatures that were enhanced and processed beforehand.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, the objectives can be the obtaining of a detection warning signal (DWS) along the scanning path, 2D depth imaging of the scanning line or 3D imaging of the suspicious region in both depth and moving direction. Identification processes [2][3][4][5][6][7] can be applied after the buried object location is determined. There are numerous methods to detect buried objects utilizing GPR; linear prediction [8][9][10], principal component analysis [11,12], independent component analysis [11], wavelet domain [13], frequency domain correlation [14,15], time domain correlation [16], linear minimum mean square error estimation, [17], Gumbel distribution [18], and least square-based [19] methods can be given in this scope.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%