2007
DOI: 10.1002/jmv.20906
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anti‐norovirus polyclonal antibody and its potential for development of an antigen‐ELISA

Abstract: Norovirus (NoV) capsid proteins were expressed as virus-like particles (VLPs) by using recombinant baculovirus in insect cells, which had 5 genotypes in genogroup I and 11 genotypes in genogroup II, and the VLPs were used as immunogens. Polyclonal antibody against the VLP of GII/3 genotype showed broad-range cross-reactivity, reacting not only with intra-genogroup strains, but also inter-genogroup strains, by antibody-ELISA using 16 kinds of VLPs. Furthermore, antigen-ELISA was conducted in sandwich enzyme-lin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison with other previous immunological methods such as ELISA and the immune-chromato- Table 3. graphic test (Khamrin et al, 2008;Takanashi et al, 2008), the detection limit of LAT (10 6 -10 7 genomic copies per gram of stool) was comparable. In our study, the specificity of the LAT for NoVs was 100%, which was comparable and even better that those from ELISA and the immune-chromatographic test (88-96%) (Rabenau et al, 2003;de Bruin et al, 2006;OkitsuNegishi et al, 2006;Okame et al, 2007;Khamrin et al, 2008;Takanashi et al, 2008). However, the sensitivity of LAT was only 35%, which was lower than that previous ELISA (31-90%) and the immune-chromatographic test (70-79%).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…In comparison with other previous immunological methods such as ELISA and the immune-chromato- Table 3. graphic test (Khamrin et al, 2008;Takanashi et al, 2008), the detection limit of LAT (10 6 -10 7 genomic copies per gram of stool) was comparable. In our study, the specificity of the LAT for NoVs was 100%, which was comparable and even better that those from ELISA and the immune-chromatographic test (88-96%) (Rabenau et al, 2003;de Bruin et al, 2006;OkitsuNegishi et al, 2006;Okame et al, 2007;Khamrin et al, 2008;Takanashi et al, 2008). However, the sensitivity of LAT was only 35%, which was lower than that previous ELISA (31-90%) and the immune-chromatographic test (70-79%).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…Okame et al [33] developed a cross-reactive sandwich ELISA for detection of multiple GI and GII strains with a similar lower detection limit (0.0024 μg/mL) [33], but their assay required five antibodies (four primaries and one labeled secondary). Conversely, the capture ELISA presented in this study needed only one primary (for capture) and one labeled secondary antibody (for detection), drastically reducing assay time and reagent need.…”
Section: The "Signal-down" Capture Elisamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current approaches for detecting norovirus in clinical and environmental samples utilize a combination of electron microscopy techniques [20][21][22][23][24], molecular detection assays [7,10,17,[25][26][27] and immunological methods [25,[28][29][30][31][32][33]. Each approach strives for maximizing sensitivity and specificity while minimizing the time for detection [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, HuNoV strains belonging to GI and GII were subdivided into at least 15 and 18 genotypes, respectively (4,5). Of these, HuNoV GII/4 has been reported as the most prevalent genotype in causing acute (4,6).…”
Section: Human Norovirus (Hunov) Is In the Familymentioning
confidence: 99%