2015
DOI: 10.1080/14639947.2015.1008090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anti-Muslim Buddhist Nationalism in Burma and Sri Lanka: Religious Violence and Globalized Imaginaries of Endangered Identities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although religious phrases may be used in violent rhetoric, it is worth noting that Buddhism itself is not violent. Therefore, as Graves [44] rightly pointed out, we should look at how the religious actors imagine and apply religion to provide legitimacy to specific political acts and violence. In fact, in Sri Lanka, both the rulers and the nationalist forces have used religion as a hegemonic means to extend their dominance in society and hold on to power.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although religious phrases may be used in violent rhetoric, it is worth noting that Buddhism itself is not violent. Therefore, as Graves [44] rightly pointed out, we should look at how the religious actors imagine and apply religion to provide legitimacy to specific political acts and violence. In fact, in Sri Lanka, both the rulers and the nationalist forces have used religion as a hegemonic means to extend their dominance in society and hold on to power.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even in the Myanmar case, most of the Rohingya Muslims are non-citizens and marginalized, and have been clamoring for recognition and status within the state. Their role in the socio-economic and political sphere in Myanmar is also limited (See: [44,48,49]). However, the case of Sri Lankan Muslims is different, to a certain extent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sinhala-Buddhist nationalist forces, mostly the monks' organizations, movements, and parties, were the major drivers that conceptualized and inflamed the anti-Muslim and anti-minority sentiments. The monks claimed that Buddhism is being threatened by aggressive Muslim preaching and that Islam poses a danger to other religions, culture, race, and economy [7]. Anti-halal and anti-animal slaughtering campaigns played vital roles in consolidating anti-Muslim sentiment in general.…”
Section: Post-civil War Anti-halal and Anti-animal Slaughtering Sentimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BBS claims that Buddhism is not protected and is threatened in Sri Lanka. They criticize the government and authorities for not protecting the Sinhala nation, race, and Buddhist religion [7]. While justifying their anti-Muslim sentiments and campaigns, Gnanasara Thero augured that "we are not terrorists and it is the sole right of the Sinhala-Buddhists to protect Sri Lanka from all other forces" [29].…”
Section: Anti-halal Sentiments and Oppositionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[23] According to the nationalistic monks, Buddhist women who married Muslims suffered and that their children lost their legal status if they did not convert. [24] IV. RESPONSES OF [26] Later, on September 3 2014, in the 55-minute video disseminated online, the Al-Qa'idah leader Ayman AlZawahiri claimed that his group had formed a unit to target Myanmar, and "the new unit is under the leadership of the Afghan Taliban leader Mullah Muhammad Omar and Pakistani militant Asim Umar".…”
Section: History Repeats Itselfmentioning
confidence: 99%