The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2020
DOI: 10.1108/jmlc-02-2020-0018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anti-money laundering systems: a systematic literature review

Abstract: Purpose This paper aims to understand and document the state of the art in the anti-money laundering (AML) systems literature. Design/methodology/approach A systematic literature review (SLR) is performed using the Saudi Digital Library. The outputs published as conference proceedings, workshop proceedings, journal articles and books were all considered. The final sample size after omitting out-of-scope selections was 27 documents, which mainly span from 2015 to 2020. Findings The sample is discussed based… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over last decades several papers have been published with different machine learning techniques summarized in many comprehensive literature review papers such as [3,21,24,25], however by looking at the penalties issued by authorities for financial institutions in single year 2019 [11], it is evident that the published methods are either not useful or not used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Over last decades several papers have been published with different machine learning techniques summarized in many comprehensive literature review papers such as [3,21,24,25], however by looking at the penalties issued by authorities for financial institutions in single year 2019 [11], it is evident that the published methods are either not useful or not used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A literature review conducted by [24] focuses on the papers published between 2015 to 2020 to understand the state-of-the-art in AML systems, presents the results using the following categoriessupervised learning, unsupervised learning, data sources, evaluation methods, implementation tools, sampling techniques and regions of study. The key findings by [24] are -Decision Tree, Radom Forest and SVM are most frequently used algorithms in AML system from supervised category, neural networks is mostly used in unsupervised category; Accuracy, Area Under the Curve (AUC) and precision are used for model evaluation; most of the data used for research was customer and transaction data from banks however there are many other methods for laundering the money such as restaurants, hotels and law offices, which are not researched enough.…”
Section: A Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mostly, the data sources for past reviews were policy documents and reports related to money laundering. Moreover, past reviews tended to focus on the role of machine learning and artificial intelligence in mitigating money laundering (Alsuwailem and Saudagar, 2020; Chen et al , 2018; Han et al , 2020), bibliometric characteristics of publications (Mei et al , 2014) and the role of nonprofit organizations (Omar et al , 2014) or shell companies (Tiwari et al , 2020) in laundering money. Alternatively, we distinguish our study by emphasizing the money laundering aspects relevant to IB.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many papers over the last demi-decade have applied various machine learning techniques to improve money laundering detection. Review papers such as [19], [8], [6], [20] have summarized the general AML methods in the literature, but it's apparent that the methods are untrusted by financial institutions and consequently unused as fines are increasing. In 2018 fines totaled $4 billion, increasing to $8 billion in 2019, and in the first half of 2020 was $6 billion [21].…”
Section: Key Shortcomings and Future Research Directions For Transact...mentioning
confidence: 99%