2013
DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-12-252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anti-malarial prescription practices among outpatients with laboratory-confirmed malaria in the setting of a health facility-based sentinel site surveillance system in Uganda

Abstract: BackgroundMost African countries have adopted artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) as the first-line treatment for uncomplicated malaria. The World Health Organization now recommends limiting anti-malarial treatment to those with a positive malaria test result. Limited data exist on how these policies have affected ACT prescription practices.MethodsData were collected from all outpatients presenting to six public health facilities in Uganda as part of a sentinel site malaria surveillance programme. Trai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

7
14
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
7
14
3
Order By: Relevance
“…First, testing rates increased by 34% reaching 58% of tested febrile patients at all facilities and 63% tested at facilities with available diagnostics. The testing levels were higher compared to reports from Zambia [18] and Angola [47], similar to those from several Tanzanian studies [9], [48][50] but lower compared to what can be achieved under more controlled, smaller scale conditions in Uganda [51]. Notably, at facilities providing both diagnostic services we found significantly higher testing rates (76%), preference for malaria microscopy, and in contrast with our previous findings [40], there was no difference in testing rates between facilities providing solely RDTs (55%) or malaria microscopy (58%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…First, testing rates increased by 34% reaching 58% of tested febrile patients at all facilities and 63% tested at facilities with available diagnostics. The testing levels were higher compared to reports from Zambia [18] and Angola [47], similar to those from several Tanzanian studies [9], [48][50] but lower compared to what can be achieved under more controlled, smaller scale conditions in Uganda [51]. Notably, at facilities providing both diagnostic services we found significantly higher testing rates (76%), preference for malaria microscopy, and in contrast with our previous findings [40], there was no difference in testing rates between facilities providing solely RDTs (55%) or malaria microscopy (58%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The fixed-dose combination Artemeter-Lumefantrine (31.1%) was the most commonly prescribed antimalarial in our study. This is much lower than 97.3% prescription rate for Artemeter-Lumefantrine reported in a recent study in Uganda (22). Availability of various types of Artemisinin-Based Combination Therapy (ACT) in Nigeria without a strict preference for any of the combinations may account for the lower rate of AL prescription in our study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…Such chloroquine use potentially creates various levels of chloroquine selecting pressure in the region, which would be one of the important factors that affects the speed of recovery of susceptible parasites [43]. However, countrywide-antimalarial survey reported no considerable difference of chloroquine use between Tororo and our study area [44][45][46], suggesting that this could not be a main factor for the observed findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%