1974
DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(74)90287-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anti-arrhythmic effects of lidocaine metabolites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the kinetics of recovery from MEGX block was prolonged somewhat by acidosis, which may promote suppression of arrhythmia in ischemic myocardium. GX was reported one-fourth as potent as lidocaine in a model of ventricular arrhythmia (Tenthorey et al, 1981), but failed to suppress ouabain-toxic atrial arrhythmias (Burney et al, 1974). The present study suggests that its antiarrhythmic action probably is minimal at clinically observed blood levels in patients with ischemic ventricular arrhythmias, since V max block at the onset of diastole was less than onesixth that seen with lidocaine, and recovery from block was not delayed by acidosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the kinetics of recovery from MEGX block was prolonged somewhat by acidosis, which may promote suppression of arrhythmia in ischemic myocardium. GX was reported one-fourth as potent as lidocaine in a model of ventricular arrhythmia (Tenthorey et al, 1981), but failed to suppress ouabain-toxic atrial arrhythmias (Burney et al, 1974). The present study suggests that its antiarrhythmic action probably is minimal at clinically observed blood levels in patients with ischemic ventricular arrhythmias, since V max block at the onset of diastole was less than onesixth that seen with lidocaine, and recovery from block was not delayed by acidosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…Previous experimental studies suggest that this MEGX concentration would produce some antiarrhythmic effect. MEGX was reported to have about one-third the equimolar potency of lidocaine for antifibrillatory action in chloroform-exposed mice, one-half the potency for premature ventricular contraction suppression in dogs after coronary ligation, full potency for suppression of ouabain-toxic atrial arrhythmias in guinea pigs, and one-fourth the potency for block of frog sciatic nerve (Ehrenberg, 1948;Smith and Duce, 1971;Burney et al, 1974). In comparison, we found that the level of V max block immediately after action potential repolarization was one-third of the block with lidocaine at 30 tiu concentration, similar to the reported potency ratios for nerve block and suppression of ventricular arrythmia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anti-convulsant activity of MEGX is unknown, although its convulsant potency has been evaluated in animal models where it was shown to be comparable to that of lidocaine [4]. The antiarrhythmic activity of MEGX has been determined in an animal model by Burney et al [5] who found it to be approximately 80% as potent an anti-arrhythmic agent as lidocaine [5]. The cardiac toxicity potency of MEGX is unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contribution of MEGX plasma concentrations in the development of toxicity as reported earlier (Strong & Atkinson, 1972;Strong et al, 1973;Halkin et al, 1975) has been supported in this investigation. This finding suggests that analytical techniques intended to aid lignocaine therapy by plasma level monitoring should include measurement of MEGX, a pharmacologically (Burney, Di Fazio, Peach, Petrie & Silvester, 1974) and toxicologically (Blumer et al, 1973) active metabolite, as well as the parent drug.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%