Abstract:Aims/hypothesis Elevated anti-angiogenic factors such as soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt1), a soluble form of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, and endoglin, a co-receptor for TGFβ1, confer high risk of pre-eclampsia in healthy pregnant women. In this multicentre prospective study, we determined levels of these and related factors in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes, a condition associated with a fourfold increase in pre-eclampsia. Methods Maternal serum sFlt1, endoglin, placental growth… Show more
“…Throughout pregnancy, ANP levels were 34% higher in these women (41). As in pre-eclampsia in nondiabetic women, pre-eclampsia in women with type 1 diabetes is also associated with elevated levels of antiangiogenetic factors in the third trimester (27). However, the function of placenta in the early stage of pregnancy judged by the level of activin A and inhibin A is often well preserved in diabetic women developing pre-eclampsia (42).…”
Section: Pre-eclampsia and Vasoactive Markersmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…However, supplementation with vitamins C and E in a randomized study including 762 women with type 1 diabetes did not reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia (30). As in pre-eclampsia in women without diabetes, pre-eclampsia in women with type 1 diabetes is also associated with elevated levels of antiangiogenetic factors in the third trimester (27).…”
Section: Pathophysiology Of Pre-eclampsia and Hypertension In Diabetimentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The prevalence of pre-eclampsia in women with diabetic nephropathy is up to 64% (4,6,11,25), especially in the presence of reduced kidney function (26), hypertension at the start of pregnancy, or nephrotic proteinuria (4,6). Women with type 1 diabetes and microalbuminuria are at increased risk of developing pre-eclampsia compared with women with type 1 diabetes and normal urinary albumin excretion (25,27). Pre-eclampsia often leads to preterm delivery (25) and preterm delivery before 34 gestational weeks has been reported in up to 45% (8,25).…”
Section: Effects Of Diabetic Nephropathy On Pregnancy Outcomementioning
SummaryThis review highlights factors of importance for the clinical care of pregnant women with pregestational diabetes and microalbuminuria or diabetic nephropathy with particular focus on the role of intensive antihypertensive treatment during pregnancy. Most information in the literature comes from women with type 1 diabetes and diabetic nephropathy, but this is probably also valid for women with type 2 diabetes. Careful counseling of women with diabetic nephropathy before pregnancy with estimation of the risk for the mother and fetus is important. Pregnancy does not result in worsening of kidney function in women with diabetic nephropathy and normal serum creatinine, but pregnancy complications such as pre-eclampsia and preterm delivery are common. Intensive metabolic control before and during pregnancy, low-dose aspirin from 12 gestational weeks onward, and intensive antihypertensive treatment are important. Methyldopa, labetalol, and nifedipine are regarded safe in pregnancy, whereas angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, AngII antagonists, or statins should be paused before pregnancy. Case series and pathophysiological studies support the use of a stringent goal for BP and albumin excretion in pregnant women with diabetic nephropathy. Screening for diabetic retinopathy before and during pregnancy is mandatory and laser treatment should be performed if indicated. Pregnancy outcome in women with diabetic nephropathy has improved considerably with a take-home-baby rate of approximately 95%. Further research on the benefits and risks of intensive antihypertensive treatment in this population is needed.
“…Throughout pregnancy, ANP levels were 34% higher in these women (41). As in pre-eclampsia in nondiabetic women, pre-eclampsia in women with type 1 diabetes is also associated with elevated levels of antiangiogenetic factors in the third trimester (27). However, the function of placenta in the early stage of pregnancy judged by the level of activin A and inhibin A is often well preserved in diabetic women developing pre-eclampsia (42).…”
Section: Pre-eclampsia and Vasoactive Markersmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…However, supplementation with vitamins C and E in a randomized study including 762 women with type 1 diabetes did not reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia (30). As in pre-eclampsia in women without diabetes, pre-eclampsia in women with type 1 diabetes is also associated with elevated levels of antiangiogenetic factors in the third trimester (27).…”
Section: Pathophysiology Of Pre-eclampsia and Hypertension In Diabetimentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The prevalence of pre-eclampsia in women with diabetic nephropathy is up to 64% (4,6,11,25), especially in the presence of reduced kidney function (26), hypertension at the start of pregnancy, or nephrotic proteinuria (4,6). Women with type 1 diabetes and microalbuminuria are at increased risk of developing pre-eclampsia compared with women with type 1 diabetes and normal urinary albumin excretion (25,27). Pre-eclampsia often leads to preterm delivery (25) and preterm delivery before 34 gestational weeks has been reported in up to 45% (8,25).…”
Section: Effects Of Diabetic Nephropathy On Pregnancy Outcomementioning
SummaryThis review highlights factors of importance for the clinical care of pregnant women with pregestational diabetes and microalbuminuria or diabetic nephropathy with particular focus on the role of intensive antihypertensive treatment during pregnancy. Most information in the literature comes from women with type 1 diabetes and diabetic nephropathy, but this is probably also valid for women with type 2 diabetes. Careful counseling of women with diabetic nephropathy before pregnancy with estimation of the risk for the mother and fetus is important. Pregnancy does not result in worsening of kidney function in women with diabetic nephropathy and normal serum creatinine, but pregnancy complications such as pre-eclampsia and preterm delivery are common. Intensive metabolic control before and during pregnancy, low-dose aspirin from 12 gestational weeks onward, and intensive antihypertensive treatment are important. Methyldopa, labetalol, and nifedipine are regarded safe in pregnancy, whereas angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, AngII antagonists, or statins should be paused before pregnancy. Case series and pathophysiological studies support the use of a stringent goal for BP and albumin excretion in pregnant women with diabetic nephropathy. Screening for diabetic retinopathy before and during pregnancy is mandatory and laser treatment should be performed if indicated. Pregnancy outcome in women with diabetic nephropathy has improved considerably with a take-home-baby rate of approximately 95%. Further research on the benefits and risks of intensive antihypertensive treatment in this population is needed.
“…Interestingly, these factors have also been implicated in the pathogenesis of the vascular complications of diabetes (12,13), suggesting that common mechanisms might underlie PE and diabetic vascular complications. Our own studies show a general elevation of endoglin among T1DM women in later pregnancy (ϳ30 wk, but before PE onset) (14). Because endoglin is one of only two antiangiogenic factors that, together, are thought to constitute a prerequisite for PE (8), this could explain the high prevalence of PE in diabetes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The study was conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, and all study participants provided written informed consent at the study centers (Australia, Norway, and United States) as previously reported (14). In the first trimester of pregnancy, 151 women with established T1DM and 24 healthy nondiabetic women were recruited.…”
Context:In nondiabetic pregnancy, cross-sectional studies have shown associations between maternal dyslipidemia and preeclampsia (PE). In type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), the prevalence of PE is increased 4-fold, but prospective associations with plasma lipoproteins are unknown.
Objectives:The aim of this study was to define lipoprotein-related markers and potential mechanisms for PE in T1DM.
Design and Settings:We conducted a multicenter prospective study in T1DM pregnancy.
Patients:We studied 118 T1DM women (26 developed PE, 92 remained normotensive). Subjects were studied at three visits before PE onset [12.2 Ϯ 1.9, 21.6 Ϯ 1.5, and 31.5 Ϯ 1.7 wk gestation (means Ϯ SD)] and at term (37.6 Ϯ 2.0 wk). Nondiabetic normotensive pregnant women (n ϭ 21) were included for reference.
Main Outcome Measures:Conventional lipid profiles, lipoprotein subclasses [defined by size (nuclear magnetic resonance) and by apolipoprotein content], serum apolipoproteins (ApoAI, ApoB, and ApoCIII), and lipolysis (ApoCIII ratio) were measured in T1DM women with and without subsequent PE.
Results:In women with vs. without subsequent PE, at the first and/or second study visits: lowdensity lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol, particle concentrations of total LDL and large (but not small) LDL, serum ApoB, and ApoB:ApoAI ratio were all increased (P Ͻ 0.05); peripheral lipoprotein lipolysis was decreased (P Ͻ 0.01). These early differences remained significant in covariate analysis (glycated hemoglobin, actual prandial status, gravidity, body mass index, and diabetes duration) but were not present at the third study visit. High-density lipoprotein and very low-density lipoprotein subclasses did not differ between groups before PE onset.
Conclusions:Early in pregnancy, increased cholesterol-rich lipoproteins and an index suggesting decreased peripheral lipolysis were associated with subsequent PE in T1DM women. Background maternal lipoprotein characteristics, perhaps masked by effects of late pregnancy, may influence PE risk.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.