2023
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/3vjnq
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anti-ableist language is fully compatible with high-quality autism research: Response to Singer et al. (2022)

Abstract: Singer et al. (2022) argue that the current lexical shift within autism research towards more neutral terminology hinders accurate scientific description of the wide range of autistic experiences, particularly within clinical and medical contexts. In this Letter to the Editor, we present an examination and criticism of these claims. This letter is authored and co-signed by a diverse group of autistic researchers, scholars, clinicians, and self-advocates with a wide range of clinical presentation and support ne… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Engaging with autistic people on the language a study uses will mean that autistic people relate to and feel the benefit of studies. And, after all, it’s autistic people’s lives we’re trying to improve, so the response to worries about language shouldn’t be, ‘that’s just how it needs to be written’ (Natri et al, 2023).…”
Section: Meaningful Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Engaging with autistic people on the language a study uses will mean that autistic people relate to and feel the benefit of studies. And, after all, it’s autistic people’s lives we’re trying to improve, so the response to worries about language shouldn’t be, ‘that’s just how it needs to be written’ (Natri et al, 2023).…”
Section: Meaningful Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is unfortunate that the letter to the editor led by Heini Natri (2023), and signed by many advocates, misrepresents and distorts the main message of Singer et al (2023). The authors of the letter claim that Singer et al dictates use of specific terms, like “severe,” “profound” and “challenging.” (4th paragraph) This is, in fact, the opposite of what the commentary calls for.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%