2020 15th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/iciea48937.2020.9248183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anthropomorphic flexible joint design and simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For case (b), where the flat surfaces were positioned with a spacing of 18mm, the applied load against one surface was shown to increase and decrease in response to pressurization only above the 310 mmHg threshold, when the dilator was rapidly expanding. The maximum load against the flat surface was observed to be 1.2 N. [9][10][11]. Figure 7a shows the von Mises Stress distribution as the proposed dilator is being expanded and Figure 7b shows results for simulated expansion with respect to pressure for each of the material models used.…”
Section: A Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For case (b), where the flat surfaces were positioned with a spacing of 18mm, the applied load against one surface was shown to increase and decrease in response to pressurization only above the 310 mmHg threshold, when the dilator was rapidly expanding. The maximum load against the flat surface was observed to be 1.2 N. [9][10][11]. Figure 7a shows the von Mises Stress distribution as the proposed dilator is being expanded and Figure 7b shows results for simulated expansion with respect to pressure for each of the material models used.…”
Section: A Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approximately 30,000 4-node tetrahedron elements were used to mesh the model. Mooney-Rivlin hyperelastic material models from [9][10][11] were implemented for comparison and a final model was chosen by fitting the expansion experimental results to the finite element simulation output, similar to the approach proposed by Gopesh et al [9]. The best fit Mooney-Rivlin coefficients were found to be C01 = 70 kPa and C10 = 0.258 kPa.…”
Section: A Dilator Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation