The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2015
DOI: 10.4103/2277-9175.150429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anthropometric predictive equations for estimating body composition

Abstract: Background:Precise and accurate measurements of body composition are useful in achieving a greater understanding of human energy metabolism in physiology and in different clinical conditions, such as, cardiovascular disease and overall mortality. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) can be used to measure body composition, but the easiest method to assess body composition is the use of anthropometric indices. This study has been designed to evaluate the accuracy and precision of body composition prediction e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, high WHR would represent a relatively high amount of visceral fat tissue [ 23 ]. However, both WC and WHR provide only indirect measurements of central adiposity [ 23 , 24 ], and WC and WHR were poor predictors of trunk fat mass when compared with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry scans [ 25 ]. Importantly, anthropometric measures such as WC and WHR are problematic in pregnant women, especially in late pregnancy, when the growing uterus may affect the measurement [ 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, high WHR would represent a relatively high amount of visceral fat tissue [ 23 ]. However, both WC and WHR provide only indirect measurements of central adiposity [ 23 , 24 ], and WC and WHR were poor predictors of trunk fat mass when compared with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry scans [ 25 ]. Importantly, anthropometric measures such as WC and WHR are problematic in pregnant women, especially in late pregnancy, when the growing uterus may affect the measurement [ 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…stature, weight, body mass index, skinfolds, hip and waist circumference) were excluded. Examples of exclusions are Salamat et al (2015), Sett and Sahu (2016) and Gabbett (2005). Studies that presented exclusively 3D or photography methods to collected data were also excluded, such as the examples of the works from Barroso et al (2005) and Coblentz et al (1991).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,9 Therefore, it is important to assess body composition to achieve a greater understanding of the physiology of these changes and the general clinical conditions of these patients by means of a combination of anthropometric measurements (including height, weight, BMI, waist circumference, percentage of fat mass (FM), hip circumference (HC), and waist-to-hip index), dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). 10,11 A high BMI is associated with radiographic joint damage that is less severe in the early stages of the disease as well as decreased mortality related to cardiovascular disease. Hence, a high BMI is considered a protective factor.…”
Section: Correlation Between Percentage Of Fat Mass and Level Of Dise...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,9 Therefore, it is important to assess body composition to achieve a greater understanding of the physiology of these changes and the general clinical conditions of these patients by means of a combination of anthropometric measurements (including height, weight, BMI, waist circumference, percentage of fat mass (FM), hip circumference (HC), and waist-to-hip index), dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). 10,11…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%