2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2010.03694.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anthropometric measures: poor predictors of body fat in children with moderate to severe cerebral palsy

Abstract: Single anthropometric measures do not perform well in predicting percentage body fat in children with or without CP. Further work is needed to develop clinically useful and simple assessments that will predict percentage body fat and to determine the relation between percentage body fat and health to guide clinical practice.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
68
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
7
68
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[7][8][9] This means that specialized tools may be necessary to truly assess body fat. Underwater weighing and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry are not feasible in most centers as regular assessment tools, but when caring for a population of children with CP, it may be reasonable to invest in skinfold calipers or bioelectric impedance monitoring.…”
Section: Is the Child Growing Properly?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9] This means that specialized tools may be necessary to truly assess body fat. Underwater weighing and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry are not feasible in most centers as regular assessment tools, but when caring for a population of children with CP, it may be reasonable to invest in skinfold calipers or bioelectric impedance monitoring.…”
Section: Is the Child Growing Properly?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kuperminc et al (2010) found that anthropometry underestimated percentage of body fat in CCP with GMFCS 3 and 4. Low BMI was linked to increased risk of postoperative ileus and superior mesenteric artery syndrome after scoliosis correction in idiopathic scoliosis children (Smith et al 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Biochemical markers, including serum albumin and total lymphocyte count, have also been recommended (Jevsevar and Karlin 1993;Braun et al 2006;Johnston 2010). However, studies have confirmed that these parameters might not be at times an optimum choice to differentiate nutritional status in CCP from a control group (Kuperminc et al 2010;Tomoum et al 2010;Omeroglu et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in body composition including altered muscle and bone mass makes these assessment tools unreliable indicators of nutritional stores. [8][9][10] Using them in a traditional manner in children with reduced muscle mass will inadvertently result in a child whose nutritional status 'on paper' looks healthy, but who in reality has excessive fat stores. Measurement of skinfolds is another tool the clinician can use to assess fat stores.…”
Section: Anthropometric Measurement and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%