1990
DOI: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.1990.tb02637.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anthropometric Indicators of Breast Cancer Risk in Japanese Women in Fukuoka

Abstract: This study was based on a case‐control study of breast cancer risk in Fukuoka, which was initiated to identify risk factors for the disease. We re‐analyzed the data of the study to evaluate the association of breast cancer with anthropometric variables in postmenopausal women. Data were obtained through interviewing 121 cases with historically confirmed breast cancer and an equal number of age‐matched hospital controls as well as neighborhood controls. The variables used for analysis were; height, weight at va… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The allele frequencies for both polymorphisms were similar to those reported in other population-based Japanese studies [17, 21, 25]. The average BMI of the control individuals was 22.3 kg/m 2 , which is consistent with the BMI in other population-based control groups [26]. Furthermore, the genotypes were apparently not reasons for visiting the Aichi Cancer Center Hospital.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The allele frequencies for both polymorphisms were similar to those reported in other population-based Japanese studies [17, 21, 25]. The average BMI of the control individuals was 22.3 kg/m 2 , which is consistent with the BMI in other population-based control groups [26]. Furthermore, the genotypes were apparently not reasons for visiting the Aichi Cancer Center Hospital.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Figure 1 shows the flow diagram for the review. Studies were excluded from the review for a variety of reasons: were earlier published results from prospective studies (26–30) ( n = 5); did not contain waist or WHR data (31–33) ( n = 3); did not perform separate analyses of pre‐ and post‐menopausal women (3,34–36) ( n = 4); did not determine odds ratios (37,38) ( n = 2); or we were unable to obtain sufficient data from the author (39) ( n = 1). Six case‐control studies were excluded as waist was measured after commencing breast cancer treatment (40–45) [chemotherapy and endocrine therapy are associated with central fat gains irrespective of increases or decreases in body weight (46)].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The positive effect of weight gain has been observed in nearly all prospective studies from Western countries ( Ahn et al , 2007 ; Barnes-Josiah et al , 1995 ; Eliassen et al , 2006 ; Feigelson et al , 2004 ; Lahmann et al , 2005 ). On the other hand, the relationship of weight loss to risk has not been fully investigated ( Eliassen et al , 2006 ; Harvie et al , 2005 ; Hirose et al , 1999 ; Kyogoku et al , 1990 ; Lahmann et al , 2005 ). Although most of the studies have observed a null or non-significant association, a few have demonstrated a significantly decreased postmenopausal risk associated with adult weight loss ( Eliassen et al , 2006 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Japan, however, few prospective studies have evaluated the association with adiposity ( Iwasaki et al , 2007 ; Kuriyama et al , 2005 ). Also, data are sparse regarding the effect of body weight change ( Hirose et al , 1999 ; Kyogoku et al , 1990 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%