This conclusion of the debate on anthropology's role in cognitive science provides some clarifications and an overview of emergent themes. It also lists, as cases of good practice, some examples of productive cross-disciplinary collaboration that evince a forward momentum in the relationship between anthropology and the other cognitive sciences. What an interesting and challenging set of commentaries! Although our intention was to be provocative, we did not begin to anticipate the range and creativity of the responses. Our introductory essay, examining the prospects for a rapprochement between anthropology and the other cognitive sciences (Beller, Bender, & Medin, 2012), started with a brief (and subjective) sketch on how the relationship between anthropology and cognitive science got into trouble (see also Gatewood, Shweder 1 ), went on to identify some of the main challenges, and ended with the suggestion that a happy reunion may be too much to be hoped for. A range of scholars from different disciplinary backgrounds, both junior and senior, were invited to respond to this essay. Each commentary provides a uniquely valuable contribution to this debate in its own right and should stand-and be read-for itself. Instead of responding to each of them, we aim for some clarifications and focus on a few emergent themes.Correspondence should be sent to