2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01191.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anthropologists as Cognitive Scientists

Abstract: Anthropology combines two quite different enterprises: the ethnographic study of particular people in particular places and the theorizing about the human species. As such, anthropology is part of cognitive science in that it contributes to the unitary theoretical aim of understanding and explaining the behavior of the animal species Homo sapiens. This article draws on our own research experience to illustrate that cooperation between anthropology and the other sub-disciplines of cognitive science is possible … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This anthropologically based approach ensured the cultural sensitivity of study designs and provided a rich basis for considering possible cultural differences. Therefore, it is advocated as standard practice among interdisciplinary researchers (e.g., Astuti & Bloch, 2012;Astuti, Solomon, & Carey, 2004;Heine, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This anthropologically based approach ensured the cultural sensitivity of study designs and provided a rich basis for considering possible cultural differences. Therefore, it is advocated as standard practice among interdisciplinary researchers (e.g., Astuti & Bloch, 2012;Astuti, Solomon, & Carey, 2004;Heine, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…From his point of view, this is a consequence of exporting our own Western notions of causality to other societies instead of looking for its subjacent ration ality and inner logic. Other approaches that appeal to a universal form of rationalism underlying cultural practice (Astuti and Bloch 2012;Bloch 1998Bloch , 2011Harris 1974Harris , 1978Sperber 1996Sperber , 2000 exemplify the reticence that exists among anthropologists concerning the general use of native categories for analytical purposes. They consider these attempts as misleading paths in the quest for clarity and understanding.…”
Section: Ethnographic Theories Of Powermentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Our essay was ambiguous concerning cognitive science as a field versus cognitive science as represented by the membership, journals, and practice associated with the Cognitive Science Society. Astuti and Bloch , Barrett, Stich, and Laurence , and Boster note that our challenge question is trivial in that, by definition, anthropology is part of cognitive science, the inter‐disciplinary study of Homo sapiens . Rothe identifies some of the institutional barriers to cognitive anthropologists participating in cognitive science and offers a number of promising suggestions for overcoming these barriers.…”
Section: Clarifications and Reframingmentioning
confidence: 99%