2020
DOI: 10.1525/9780520975163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anthropologies of Revolution

Abstract: Conclusion. Worlds in Revolution References Index vii Acknowled gmentsThis book is the outcome of "Comparative Anthropology of Revolutionary Politics" (CARP), a five-year research project dedicated to developing a distinctively anthropological understanding of revolutions. The project was funded by a Consolidator grant of the European Research Council (ERC-2013-CoG, 617970, CARP) and led by Martin Holbraad at University College London from 2014 to 2019. For catalytic discussions on the anthropology of revoluti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is possible to notice clear elements of continuity in these Roman busts with older local practices in the framework of Cyrenean funerary habits, especially in terms of display strategies and possible ritual use of the courtyards and of the tomb façades. There are surprising similarities with the use of earlier half figures of funerary divinities atop inscribed bases; in this sense, the niches for portrait busts were a way through which Roman practices were ‘domesticated’ for expressing local traditional needs (Cherstich and Cherstich 2008; L. Cherstich 2011, 36–37).…”
Section: Approaching Reuse In Cyrene: Past Scholarship and Problems Omentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, it is possible to notice clear elements of continuity in these Roman busts with older local practices in the framework of Cyrenean funerary habits, especially in terms of display strategies and possible ritual use of the courtyards and of the tomb façades. There are surprising similarities with the use of earlier half figures of funerary divinities atop inscribed bases; in this sense, the niches for portrait busts were a way through which Roman practices were ‘domesticated’ for expressing local traditional needs (Cherstich and Cherstich 2008; L. Cherstich 2011, 36–37).…”
Section: Approaching Reuse In Cyrene: Past Scholarship and Problems Omentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The eclectic artistic culture, typical of the Roman world, meets the local Greco-Libyan substratus (Menozzi 2014). The busts are, at this point, located on the façades of the tombs, without any architectural relationship with the symmetric arrangement of the façades (although there are also scholars who stress elements of continuity with previous practices and display strategies, as stressed in Cherstich 2011; Cherstich and Cherstich 2008). The second century AD in Cyrenaica is characterized by new influences coming from Roman architecture: the reuse of earlier graves and tombs, through the enlargement of loculi and the cutting of niches for portrait-busts; and the construction of new tombs, mainly devoted to the elite.…”
Section: The Roman Periodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The zone includes the Western necropolis with the amazing painted Hellenistic tombs (Fabbricotti 2006) and the series of wonderful Archaic and Classical chambers (Di Valerio 2008, Cherstich I. 2008) or the still-preserved Balagrae Road in the Southern Necropolis (Cherstich L. 2006a, 2008) which has an inscribed Roman milestone, farms, cisterns and forms an important part of the ancient landscape. The loss of these remains would be very damaging to the heritage.Core Zone 2 is important not only for preserving the integrity of the archaeological landscape, but also the natural landscape which is an important part of the heritage of this area.…”
Section: Cyrene: Core and Buffer Zones (Omenozzi E DI Valerio Mgmentioning
confidence: 99%