2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2008.00875.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anthropological Measurement of Lower Limb and Foot Bones Using Multi‐Detector Computed Tomography

Abstract: Anthropological examination of defleshed bones is the gold standard for osteological measurement in forensic practice. However, multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) offers the opportunity of three-dimensional imaging of skeletal elements, allowing measurement of bones in any plane without defleshing. We present our experiences of the examination of 15 human lower limbs in different states of decomposition using MDCT. We present our method of imaging and radiological measurement of the bones including sex … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
37
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
37
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the 95% confidence interval for the measurement difference between CT and dry bone measurements of the lower limb and foot was approximately +/-5 mm [2], which is considerably larger than the generally accepted level in anthropology. The range of measurement error obtained by Verhoff et al [19] is between 1 and 2 mm; a result that is more acceptable within forensic applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, the 95% confidence interval for the measurement difference between CT and dry bone measurements of the lower limb and foot was approximately +/-5 mm [2], which is considerably larger than the generally accepted level in anthropology. The range of measurement error obtained by Verhoff et al [19] is between 1 and 2 mm; a result that is more acceptable within forensic applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…air and bone). Several studies compared the measurements obtained from bones within the soft tissues and measurements of the same bones following the removal of soft tissues [1, 2,19]. Both Decker et al…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Culbert and Law (1927) Currently there is no agreed protocol to create a biological profile from PMCT examination of juveniles or adults. The literature presents a number of studies using single osteological or odontological assessments to assist with biological profiling (41)(42)(43)(44), but a system compiling all of these assessments into a single protocol had yet to be published or presented. In addition, the majority of these studies have been conducted using an adult cohort, with very few extending to the juvenile age range.…”
Section: Pmct and Developing Human Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%