2009
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2009.1339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anthropoid versus strepsirhine status of the African Eocene primates Algeripithecus and Azibius : craniodental evidence

Abstract: Recent fossil discoveries have demonstrated that Africa and Asia were epicentres for the origin and/or early diversification of the major living primate lineages, including both anthropoids (monkeys, apes and humans) and crown strepsirhine primates (lemurs, lorises and galagos). Competing hypotheses favouring either an African or Asian origin for anthropoids rank among the most hotly contested issues in paleoprimatology. The Afrocentric model for anthropoid origins rests heavily on the .45 Myr old fossil Alger… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
45
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although their affinities are widely debated, most of the fragmentary early (Paleocene to mid-Eocene) fossils that have been proposed recently as candidate basal anthropoids (Eosimias, Algeripithecus, Biretia, Altiatlasius, Anthrasimias) exhibit some combination of diminutive size, moderately trenchant cheek teeth, and enlarged orbits, suggesting derivation from a small, visually predatory ancestor. 101,[108][109][110][111][112][113] Can we then still attribute the origin of the distinctive euprimate traits to a basal adaptive shift involving visually directed predation? I am now inclined to think that the whole notion of a defining adaptive shift that accounts for ''primate origins'' is another hallucination born of ignorance.…”
Section: Primate Origins?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although their affinities are widely debated, most of the fragmentary early (Paleocene to mid-Eocene) fossils that have been proposed recently as candidate basal anthropoids (Eosimias, Algeripithecus, Biretia, Altiatlasius, Anthrasimias) exhibit some combination of diminutive size, moderately trenchant cheek teeth, and enlarged orbits, suggesting derivation from a small, visually predatory ancestor. 101,[108][109][110][111][112][113] Can we then still attribute the origin of the distinctive euprimate traits to a basal adaptive shift involving visually directed predation? I am now inclined to think that the whole notion of a defining adaptive shift that accounts for ''primate origins'' is another hallucination born of ignorance.…”
Section: Primate Origins?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Afrotarsius, from the Egyptian Oligocene, resembles stem anthropoids (41), but also tarsiids (13,42). Algeripithecus (early to middle Eocene, Algeria) was commonly recognized as an anthropoid (39), but recent discoveries of more complete specimens suggest that it is not anthropoid but instead may belong to the Azibiidae (43). Azibiids are argued to be adapiforms, early euprimates, plesiadapiforms (possible stem primates), or even nonprimates (14,44,45), and there is no consensus on their phylogenetic position.…”
Section: Phylogenetics Of Crown Primatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Azibiids are argued to be adapiforms, early euprimates, plesiadapiforms (possible stem primates), or even nonprimates (14,44,45), and there is no consensus on their phylogenetic position. However, the oblique orientation of the lacrimal canal relative to the infraorbital canal indicates that they are not crown haplorhines (Tarsius and anthropoids have more vertically oriented lacrimal canals) (43). Specimens attributed to another supposed anthropoid from Algeria, Tabelia, are probably specimens of Algeripithecus or Azibius (43).…”
Section: Phylogenetics Of Crown Primatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, decisive progress has recently been achieved in understanding some of the earliest purported African anthropoids. Algeripithecus, which was originally described on the basis of two isolated molars as an early middle Eocene African anthropoid (13), is now recognized as a strepsirrhine, following the discovery of more nearly complete material (14). Other African fossil sites that are older than late middle Eocene, such as the Chambi locality in Tunisia, have so far yielded only strepsirrhine primates (15).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%