2019
DOI: 10.1029/2019gl085412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anthropogenic Air Pollution Delays Marine Stratocumulus Breakup to Open Cells

Abstract: Marine stratocumulus cloud (Sc) decks with high cloud fraction typically breakup when sufficient drizzle forms. Cloud breakup leads to a lower cloud radiative effect due to the lower cloud amount. Here we use realistic Lagrangian large eddy simulations along a 3-day trajectory, evaluated with satellite observations, to investigate the timing of Sc breakup in response to aerosol conditions. We show that the timing of the breakup is strongly modulated by the diurnal cycle and large-scale meteorology but varies s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
39
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
10
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For MODIS/Terra, λ is −0.09 (95% confidence interval: −0.31 to 0.08) and for MODIS/Aqua, λ is −0.39 (−0.68 to −0.14), giving a daily mean λ value of −0.24 (−0.42 to −0.08). These λ values are at the more negative end of estimates previously reported in the literature, as compiled by Sato and Suzuki (), and are in line with the values for higher N d from Gryspeerdt, Goren et al () and lower r e from Toll et al (). However, as the relationship between liquid water path and cloud droplet number is not necessarily linear in relative changes or even monotonic (Gryspeerdt, Goren et al, ), there is uncertainty inherent in applying the λ values estimated here more broadly (particularly in regions with greater precipitation).…”
Section: Cloud Macrophysical Changessupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For MODIS/Terra, λ is −0.09 (95% confidence interval: −0.31 to 0.08) and for MODIS/Aqua, λ is −0.39 (−0.68 to −0.14), giving a daily mean λ value of −0.24 (−0.42 to −0.08). These λ values are at the more negative end of estimates previously reported in the literature, as compiled by Sato and Suzuki (), and are in line with the values for higher N d from Gryspeerdt, Goren et al () and lower r e from Toll et al (). However, as the relationship between liquid water path and cloud droplet number is not necessarily linear in relative changes or even monotonic (Gryspeerdt, Goren et al, ), there is uncertainty inherent in applying the λ values estimated here more broadly (particularly in regions with greater precipitation).…”
Section: Cloud Macrophysical Changessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…For the increase in cloud droplet number concentration with aerosol ( β ) and cloud albedo with droplet concentration ( χ ), we would expect errors here to tend to overestimate the changes (i.e., effects may saturate more rapidly in reality than under an assumption of linearity). For liquid water path changes with droplet number ( λ ), the effects could be subtler as factors such as the free tropospheric relative humidity and likelihood of clouds to precipitate in the absence of an aerosol perturbation could cause λ to vary in magnitude and sign with meteorological conditions (Gryspeerdt, Goren et al, ; Toll et al, , ).…”
Section: Observationally Informed Global Radiative Forcing Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…With a higher background CF, there is less scope for a forcing due to a CF increase (Goren et al, 2019). This interpretation is supported by the results at a constant cloud fraction (Fig.…”
Section: Lwp Developmentsupporting
confidence: 70%