2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-44736-9_49
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anthropocentric Workplaces of the Future Approached through a New Holistic Vision

Abstract: Part 1: Knowledge-Based SustainabilityInternational audienceThe human dimension is growing in importance in the cul- tural and scientific debate surrounding the arising of workplace and fac- tory of the future visions. Having people at the centre of the factory is already recognized as a main enabler for making the most out of their skills and capacities while at the same time achieving an environment that can both motivate employed workers and attract new skilled ones. The present paper proposes a novel conce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the definition of Socially Sustainable Workplace by Hancock et al (2015), the four dimensions mentioned by Bettoni et al (2014), the abilities described by Taghavi, Adams and Berlin (2014) and the definition by LCSP (1998) (i.e., "the creation of goods and services using processes and systems […] safe and healthful for employees, communities and consumers; and socially and creatively rewarding for all working people"), we can synthesize some pillars regarding social sustainability for workers. First, working activities should be designed to meet the requirements of all worker life-stages, meaning that the physical and physiological wellbeing of the worker is central.…”
Section: Social Sustainability In Production Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the definition of Socially Sustainable Workplace by Hancock et al (2015), the four dimensions mentioned by Bettoni et al (2014), the abilities described by Taghavi, Adams and Berlin (2014) and the definition by LCSP (1998) (i.e., "the creation of goods and services using processes and systems […] safe and healthful for employees, communities and consumers; and socially and creatively rewarding for all working people"), we can synthesize some pillars regarding social sustainability for workers. First, working activities should be designed to meet the requirements of all worker life-stages, meaning that the physical and physiological wellbeing of the worker is central.…”
Section: Social Sustainability In Production Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The challenge is to align an understanding of the requirements of competitiveness with those that represent long-term sustainability (Garetti and Taisch, 2012). All the aspects of social sustainability in manufacturing, such as work-life balance, physical and psychological wellbeing of the workers, ageing, and diversity, need to be considered (Eijnatten, 2000;Taghavi, Barletta and Berlin, 2015) alongside the desired production outcomes, in order to achieve system solutions that make the best of people and technologies (Bettoni et al, 2014). The development of an appropriate performance measurement system, identifying the key dimensions and objectives to be measured and designing the measures themselves, is therefore of paramount importance (Arena et al, 2009;Winroth, Almström and Andersson, 2012;Bengo et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MAN-MADE (MANufacturing through ergonoMic and safe Anthropocentric aDaptive workplacEs for context aware factories in EUROPE) project aims at defining new socially sustainable workplaces where workers are foreseen at the centre of the factory [18], especially in terms of workplace adaptation. The worker-centric manufacturing model is, then, demonstrated in a pilot implementation at the training assembly line of an Italian producer of white-goods.…”
Section: Case 2: Man-made Worker-centric Adaptive Workplacementioning
confidence: 99%