2008
DOI: 10.2172/948503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anthrax Sampling and Decontamination: Technology Trade-Offs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two other articles have been published since then that provide overviews of decontamination approaches for B. anthracis. 3,15 While these previous review articles provide helpful, qualitative summaries of decontamination approaches and operational aspects that could be employed after a release of B. anthracis spores, they generally lack detailed data to document the conditions in which the decontaminants are effective. This current review highlights the scientific and technological advances made relative to B. anthracis spore decontamination technologies since these initial reviews, that is, from approximately 2002, and identifies knowledge gaps.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two other articles have been published since then that provide overviews of decontamination approaches for B. anthracis. 3,15 While these previous review articles provide helpful, qualitative summaries of decontamination approaches and operational aspects that could be employed after a release of B. anthracis spores, they generally lack detailed data to document the conditions in which the decontaminants are effective. This current review highlights the scientific and technological advances made relative to B. anthracis spore decontamination technologies since these initial reviews, that is, from approximately 2002, and identifies knowledge gaps.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few years following the Amerithrax incident, a review of B. anthracis spore inactivation techniques and a compilation of building decontamination alternatives were published. Two other articles have been published since then that provide overviews of decontamination approaches for B. anthracis . , While these previous review articles provide helpful, qualitative summaries of decontamination approaches and operational aspects that could be employed after a release of B. anthracis spores, they generally lack detailed data to document the conditions in which the decontaminants are effective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decontamination and cleanup of the 2001 attack sites produced extensive quantities of potentially contaminated wastes, including material removed from the buildings such as office furniture, computers, printers, carpets, draperies, wallboard, and ceiling panels as well as all personal protective equipment used in the decontamination process (Canter et al, 2009;Price et al, 2008). Some debris was incinerated and some was shipped to Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Subtitle D solid waste landfills for final disposition (Canter et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limitations in sampling and analytical methods for viable B. anthracis spores further compound the disposal issue (Canter et al, 2009;Price et al, 2008). For example, wipe samples may not be representative of the entire building and hot spots may be missed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…such as Bacillus anthracis, the causative agent of anthrax, can persist in the environment for decades (6), thereby presenting an ongoing risk of infection that can prevent the reoccupation of contaminated areas unless costly decontamination processes are undertaken (7,8). Other biological agents, such as Yersinia pestis, the causative agent of pneumonic plague, are highly infectious; hence the risk to the public can spread far beyond the original site of dissemination (9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%