Abstract:12074 Background: Female Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) survivors treated with chest radiotherapy (RT) at a young age have a strongly increased risk of breast cancer (BC). Recently concern has been raised that anthracyclines may also increase BC risk, based on studies in childhood cancer survivors with/without a history of chest RT. So far, the association between anthracyclines and BC risk has not been examined in cancer survivors treated at adolescent/adult ages. Now that RT dose and volumes are decreasing, the pote… Show more
“…In conclusion, the study by Neppelenbroek et al 12 highlights the important issue of second cancers and particularly the increased risk of breast cancer, after cure of Hodgkin lymphoma. Their work shows that although the effects of radiotherapy have been known for many years, chemotherapy and specifically doxorubicin, is also a factor in generating increased risk meaning that the consequences of all treatment being considered for the newly diagnosed patient have to be carefully weighed in the decision-making process.…”
Section: The Takeawaymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Paradoxically, when considering breast cancer risk due to radiotherapy, these older regimens had a protective effect because of the high incidence of premature menopause they induced. ABVD is far less damaging in terms of gonadal toxicity 16 but contains doxorubicin, which we now know from the work by Neppelenbroek et al, 12 has an independent effect on breast cancer risk. Confirmatory studies using independent data sets will of course be crucial, and we look forward to seeing the results of these.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, extreme caution is required because 10 years is still early for evaluating a second cancer end point when these events typically emerge beyond this time and persist for 30 years. 1,11 With a focus over many years on the breast cancer risk posed by radiotherapy in women treated for Hodgkin lymphoma, the article accompanying this editorial by Neppelenbroek et al 12 describing the breast cancer risk associated with exposure to doxorubicin is intriguing and thought provoking. This study from the Netherlands involved a cohort of 1,964 females age 15-50 years when treated for Hodgkin lymphoma between 1975 and 2008 and who subsequently survived at least 5 years.…”
“…In conclusion, the study by Neppelenbroek et al 12 highlights the important issue of second cancers and particularly the increased risk of breast cancer, after cure of Hodgkin lymphoma. Their work shows that although the effects of radiotherapy have been known for many years, chemotherapy and specifically doxorubicin, is also a factor in generating increased risk meaning that the consequences of all treatment being considered for the newly diagnosed patient have to be carefully weighed in the decision-making process.…”
Section: The Takeawaymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Paradoxically, when considering breast cancer risk due to radiotherapy, these older regimens had a protective effect because of the high incidence of premature menopause they induced. ABVD is far less damaging in terms of gonadal toxicity 16 but contains doxorubicin, which we now know from the work by Neppelenbroek et al, 12 has an independent effect on breast cancer risk. Confirmatory studies using independent data sets will of course be crucial, and we look forward to seeing the results of these.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, extreme caution is required because 10 years is still early for evaluating a second cancer end point when these events typically emerge beyond this time and persist for 30 years. 1,11 With a focus over many years on the breast cancer risk posed by radiotherapy in women treated for Hodgkin lymphoma, the article accompanying this editorial by Neppelenbroek et al 12 describing the breast cancer risk associated with exposure to doxorubicin is intriguing and thought provoking. This study from the Netherlands involved a cohort of 1,964 females age 15-50 years when treated for Hodgkin lymphoma between 1975 and 2008 and who subsequently survived at least 5 years.…”
“…Maybe the results were biased by an increase in smoking rates among women during the same period, leading to an increased incidence of lung cancers among female survivors 32 , 37 or maybe the advantage of using smaller radiotherapy volumes disappeared, as a result of the increased usage of anthracyclines. 38 , 39 Also, because of the long latency to second cancers, the lack of trial effect could simply be due to a shorter observation time. 20 According to Schaapveld et al, the risk of second cancer is still elevated 35 years or more after treatment.…”
Studies have shown higher survival rates for patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) treated within clinical trials compared to patients treated outside clinical trials.However, endpoints are often limited to overall survival (OS). In this retrospective cohort study, we investigated the effect of trial participation on OS, the incidence of relapse, second cancer, and cardiovascular disease (CVD). The study population consisted of patients with HL, aged between 14 and 51 years at diagnosis, who started their treatment between 1962 and 2002 at three Dutch cancer centres. Patients were either included in the EORTC Lymphoma Group trials (H1-H9) or treated according to standard guidelines at the time. After adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics, trial participation was associated with longer OS (median OS: 29.4 years [95%CI: 27.0-31.6] for treatment inside trials versus 27.4 years [95%CI:26.0-28.5] for treatment outside trials, p = .046), a lower incidence of relapse (HR = 0.79, 95%CI: 0.63-0.98, p = .036) and a higher incidence of CVD (HR = 1.49, 95%CI: 1.23-1.79, p < .001). The trial effect for CVD was present only for patients treated before 1983. No evidence of differences in the incidence of second cancer was found. Consequently, essential results from clinical trials should be implemented into standard practice without undue delay.
“…Second, despite recent evidence for chemotherapy-related mortality risk of second breast cancer in Hodgkin lymphoma patients 34,35 , there is no published dose-response relationship and so we could not take account of this additional risk in our model. Third, the late-effects from HL treatments typically do not manifest for at least a decade after completion of therapy, and continue to develop beyond 30 years from treatment.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.