2020
DOI: 10.1002/dad2.12068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anterolateral entorhinal cortex thickness as a new biomarker for early detection of Alzheimer's disease

Abstract: Introduction Loss of entorhinal cortex (EC) layer II neurons represents the earliest Alzheimer's disease (AD) lesion in the brain. Research suggests differing functional roles between two EC subregions, the anterolateral EC (aLEC) and the posteromedial EC (pMEC). Methods We use joint label fusion to obtain aLEC and pMEC cortical thickness measurements from serial magnetic resonance imaging scans of 775 ADNI‐1 participants (219 healthy; 380 mild cognitive impairment; 176… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
22
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
6
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another factor that might have an effect is the severity of Alzheimer's disease patients in the study population and the size of the study population. The entorhinal cortex thickness in this study has a minimal difference in a study from Holbrook et al (12) , where the mean entorhinal cortex thickness was 1.97±0.19 mm. In another study from Velayudhan et al (13) , the mean entorhinal cortex thickness had a fairly significant difference with of the entorhinal cortex thickness in this study, which 2.6±0.53 mm.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…Another factor that might have an effect is the severity of Alzheimer's disease patients in the study population and the size of the study population. The entorhinal cortex thickness in this study has a minimal difference in a study from Holbrook et al (12) , where the mean entorhinal cortex thickness was 1.97±0.19 mm. In another study from Velayudhan et al (13) , the mean entorhinal cortex thickness had a fairly significant difference with of the entorhinal cortex thickness in this study, which 2.6±0.53 mm.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…Root mean square error (RMSE) between the actual and predicted ages are the quantity used for comparative evaluation. As we have explained previously 20 , we find these evaluation measures to be much more useful than some other commonly applied criteria as they are closer to assessing the actual utility of these thickness measurements as actual biomarkers for disease 46 In addition to the training data listed above, to ensure generalizability, we also compared performance using the SRPB data set 6 comprising over 1600 participants from 12 sites. Note that we recognize that we are processing data through the proposed deep learning-based pipeline that were used to train certain components of this pipeline.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another limitation is the absence of biomarker data concerning potential AD pathology. The grey matter differences that were observed in the ERC in our at-risk group may provide an indirect marker of potential AD pathology given prior work showing associations between ERC thickness and tau pathology (Holbrook et al, 2019; Velayudhan et al, 2013), but future work employing in vivo biomarkers is needed to address this question. Moreover, it is important to note that not every adult identified as at-risk in our study will move on to develop clinical memory impairment or an AD diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%