2015
DOI: 10.2147/imcrj.s89965
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anterior uveitis following eyebrow epilation with alexandrite laser

Abstract: Ocular tissues are known to be sensitive to damage from exposure to laser emissions. This study reports the case of a female patient with acute unilateral anterior uveitis caused by alexandrite laser-assisted hair removal of the eyebrows. We report a 38-year-old female who presented with unilateral eye pain, redness, and photophobia after receiving alexandrite (755 nm) laser epilation of both eyebrows. Best corrected visual acuity was 20/20 in both eyes. Right eye examination was normal. Left eye examination s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of OCTA images has the significant advantage over fluorescein and indocyanine green angiography of allowing sublayer en face visualization [5-6]. The OCTA images in our report visualized the intact retinal vessels and simultaneous damage to choriocapillaris and choroid from initial presentation to one-month follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The use of OCTA images has the significant advantage over fluorescein and indocyanine green angiography of allowing sublayer en face visualization [5-6]. The OCTA images in our report visualized the intact retinal vessels and simultaneous damage to choriocapillaris and choroid from initial presentation to one-month follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Ocular complications such as anisocoria, uveitis, pupillary distortion, posterior synechiae, iris atrophy, nuclear cataract, visual field defect, macular hole, and retinal scarring have been reported with Diode laser (800 nm), Alexandrite laser (755 nm), and Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) (500-1200 nm), mostly related to lack of eye protection [18][19][20][21]. Although PDL has a lower tissue penetration (wavelength of 595 nm), permanent visual impairment has also been reported [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wearing goggles is mandatory to avoid complications during facial hair removal [1]. Actually, there are various laser-based systems used for this procedure: Red spectrum Ruby (694 nm), Alexandrite (755 nm), Diode (800-810 nm), and Nd Yag (1064 nm) [2]. Intense pulsed light (IPL) is an alternative to laser hair removal, and are broadband flash lights that emit polychromatic incoherent high-intensity pulsed light (590-1200 nm) [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intense pulsed light (IPL) is an alternative to laser hair removal, and are broadband flash lights that emit polychromatic incoherent high-intensity pulsed light (590-1200 nm) [3]. According to the literature, ocular complications are not negligible: anterior uveitis, iritis and iris atrophy, pupillary distortion, posterior synechiae, anterior chamber pig-ment, and cataracts in the anterior subcapsular region have been reported [2,4]. Currently, ocular complications appeared more often in women undergoing treatment with the Diode laser [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%