1991
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(91)90898-n
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anterior sternal retraction for reoperative median sternotomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eddy et al 2 reported a significantly higher incidence of severe injuries to the heart or great vessels when the blind resternotomy technique was used than when the retrosternal direct-vision approach was used, at 6% versus 0%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Eddy et al 2 reported a significantly higher incidence of severe injuries to the heart or great vessels when the blind resternotomy technique was used than when the retrosternal direct-vision approach was used, at 6% versus 0%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…1,2 The previously reported safe and effective techniques for sternal re-entry 1-6 can be classified into two groups, namely, blind resternotomy and direct-vision sternal re-entry. The former involves repeat sternal division using an oscillating saw, followed by dissection of retrosternal adhesions, whereas the latter involves elevation of the sternum allowing direct-vision dissection of the retrosternal adhesions, followed by sternal splitting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Safe and effective techniques for sternal re-entry are classified into two groups: blind resternotomy using an oscillating saw, 2 and directvision sternal re-entry involving elevation of the sternum to allow for direct-vision dissection of retrosternal adhesions. 3 However, the risk of catastrophic hemor- rhage is still as high as 1%, even though risks associated with direct-vision sternal re-entry are lower than the risks associated with blind resternotomy. 2,3 Repeat sternotomy is also a predictor for postoperative sternal infection, 4 with a reported risk of 0.6%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 However, the risk of catastrophic hemor- rhage is still as high as 1%, even though risks associated with direct-vision sternal re-entry are lower than the risks associated with blind resternotomy. 2,3 Repeat sternotomy is also a predictor for postoperative sternal infection, 4 with a reported risk of 0.6%. It has also been reported that major pectoralis muscle reconstruction or other muscle flaps need to be used to prevent infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These risks increase as the number of previous surgeries increase and are present regardless of age group or type of procedure . Multiple strategies for sternal reentry have been proposed . We have developed a technique for sternal reentry that is adaptable to both pediatric and adult congenital patients with the use of a retractor that was developed by Rultract Inc. (Cleveland, OH).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%