2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(01)00567-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anterior spinal cord injury with preserved neurogenic ‘motor’ evoked potentials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…SSEP recording is not of much use in detecting and preventing a procedure-related motor deficit. In recent years, intraoperative spinal eMEP recording has proven very valuable in spinal cord tumor surgery because it allows monitoring of D waves and the intraoperative decrease in its amplitude (41,50). The major advantage of combined mMEP and eMEP monitoring is that it identifies impairment of the functional integrity of the motor pathways before a permanent deficit has occurred (38,40,41,70).…”
Section: Ionmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SSEP recording is not of much use in detecting and preventing a procedure-related motor deficit. In recent years, intraoperative spinal eMEP recording has proven very valuable in spinal cord tumor surgery because it allows monitoring of D waves and the intraoperative decrease in its amplitude (41,50). The major advantage of combined mMEP and eMEP monitoring is that it identifies impairment of the functional integrity of the motor pathways before a permanent deficit has occurred (38,40,41,70).…”
Section: Ionmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, ''neurogenic MEPs'' peripheral nerve potentials evoked by spinal cord stimulation turned out not to be motor [8,20,35]. Nevertheless, terminology established by the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology (IFCN), American Clinical Neurophysiology Society (ACNS) and American Society of Neurophysiologic Monitoring (ASNM) is accurate, widely applied and acceptable [1,4,16,34].…”
Section: Miom Rationale and Nomenclaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a spinal cord stimulation technique, it is not possible to determine laterality of the response. In addition, another and perhaps more important reason is the evidence that has indicated that NMEP are not mediated by motor pathways but instead by antidromic conduction in sensory pathways and therefore are not a motor response at all [ 6,26 ] . Today transcranial electrical stimulation is the standard method used to generate an MEP response.…”
Section: Technical Aspects Of Mep Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus MEP monitoring has been embraced by spine and neurological surgeons as a method to help prevent surgical intervention from exceeding safe limits where risk and severity of the potential surgical injury exceeds the functional gain [ 3 ] . Since MEP monitoring, particularly in spinal surgery, has a better correlation with good postoperative motor outcome than the use of SEPs, many experts advocate MEP monitoring for all surgeries (1) surgical correction of axial skeletal deformity [4][5][6][7] , (2) intramedullary spinal cord tumors [8][9][10][11] , (3) intracranial tumors [12][13][14] , and (4) CNS vascular lesions [15][16][17] . Uses of MEPs continue to expand.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%