2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2011.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anterior–posterior stability of the knee by an MR image subtraction method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meniscal movements of the model followed closely experimental results (Vedi et al 1999;Arno et al 2011). During the loading response, the highest radial displacement of , 2 mm was predicted for the lateral meniscus, whereas during the terminal stance, the highest radial displacement of , 2.5 mm was predicted to occur in the medial meniscus.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Meniscal movements of the model followed closely experimental results (Vedi et al 1999;Arno et al 2011). During the loading response, the highest radial displacement of , 2 mm was predicted for the lateral meniscus, whereas during the terminal stance, the highest radial displacement of , 2.5 mm was predicted to occur in the medial meniscus.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In our model, movements of the meniscal horns were , 0.6 mm during the first peak loading force. In the experimental measurements (axial load of 660 N and flexion angle of 158), the corresponding values for movements of meniscal horns varied between 0 and 0.68 mm (Arno et al 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methodology used was similar to the protocol of Arno et al [6]. Subjects were placed supine in a plastic rig with the nonsurgical knee at 15°of flexion.…”
Section: Assessment Of Footprint and Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was then repeated for the knee that underwent the ACL reconstruction. The loads used were chosen to mimic anatomic loading conditions, although the compression was reduced by a factor of 3 because it was not practical for patients to sustain such loads for the duration of the MRI scan [6,15,21].…”
Section: Assessment Of Footprint and Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 The radioactivity and the high intensity magnetic field of X-ray and MRI image can cause severe harm to human body. Also the bone mirror detection can give rise to physical pain for patients.…”
Section: Infrared Image Characteristic Of Knee Jointmentioning
confidence: 99%