Anterior lumbar interbody fusion: Does stable anterior fixation matter?

Madan, Sanjeev; Harley, John M.; Boeree, N. R.

doi:10.1007/s00586-003-0543-x

Cited by 28 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…[21][22][23] Fusion rates and clinical outcome evaluation were not the intention of this study. The immediate and short-term advantages of TLIF over AP surgery have been revealed by comparing operative data, hospitalization time, and complication rate.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Perioperative Complications in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Anterior–Posterior Reconstruction for Lumbar Disc Degeneration and Instability

Villavicencio

Burneikienė

Bulsara

et al. 2006

Journal of Spinal Disorders &Amp; Techniques

166

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Perioperative Complications in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Anterior–Posterior Reconstruction for Lumbar Disc Degeneration and Instability

Villavicencio

Burneikienė

Bulsara

et al. 2006

Journal of Spinal Disorders &Amp; Techniques

166

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For fusion, good outcomes are reported in 49-88% of the cases (Fritzell et al, 2003;Hanley and David, 1999;Madan et al, 2003 1999). For implantation of an artificial intervertebral device, good outcomes are reported in 50-99% of the cases (Guyer and Ohnmeiss, 2003;Jin et al, 2003;Kleuver et al, 2003).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 93%

Biomechanical comparison between fusion of two vertebrae and implantation of an artificial intervertebral disc

Denoziere

2006

Journal of Biomechanics

220

145

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…However, in procedures without accompanying PSF, single-segment ALIF for intervertebral fusion may lead to spinal instability [19] . Therefore, posterior PSF (including translaminar facet screw fixation) [20,21] is usually performed in conjunction with ALIF to improve the interbody fusion rate.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Biomechanical comparison of anterior lumbar screw-plate fixation versus posterior lumbar pedicle screw fixation

Liu

Guo

Zhou

et al. 2014

J. Huazhong Univ. Sci. Technol. [Med. Sci.]

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) followed by posterior pedicle screw fixation (PSF) in a second procedure is mostly used to implement lumbar spine fusion. ALIF followed by anterior lumbar screw-plate has a lot of advantages, but its biomechanical stability requires confirmation. This study evaluated the biomechanical stability of a novel anterior lumbar locked screw-plate (ALLSP) by comparison with posterior lumbar PSF. Twelve fresh human cadaveric lumbar specimens (L4-L5) were assigned to four groups: ALIF+PSF group, ALIF+ALLSP (both fixed) group, ALIF group and an untreated control (both non-fixed) group. The first three groups received implantation of a rectangular titanium cage. Tests under axial compression, flexion, extension, lateral bending, or rotation showed that the fixed groups had significantly stronger stability than the non-fixed groups (P=0.000 for all). The ALIF+ALLSP group had significantly greater axial stiffness under applied axial compression and significantly less angular displacement under rotational forces than the ALIF+PSF group. The angular displacement of the ALIF+ALLSP group was less under flexion than that of the ALIF+PSF, and the angular displacement under lateral bending and extension was greater, but these differences were not statistically significant. In summary, the ALLSP conforms to the anterior lumbar spine and has good biomechanical stability. It is a reliable choice for enhancing the stability of ALIF.

show abstract

Anterior lumbar interbody fusion: Does stable anterior fixation matter?

Cited by 28 publications

References 36 publications

Perioperative Complications in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Anterior–Posterior Reconstruction for Lumbar Disc Degeneration and Instability

Perioperative Complications in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Anterior–Posterior Reconstruction for Lumbar Disc Degeneration and Instability

Biomechanical comparison between fusion of two vertebrae and implantation of an artificial intervertebral disc

Biomechanical comparison of anterior lumbar screw-plate fixation versus posterior lumbar pedicle screw fixation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About