Abstract:The decision as to whether a sensation is perceived as painful does not only depend on sensory input but also on the significance of the stimulus. Here, we show that the degree to which an impending stimulus is interpreted as threatening biases perceptual decisions about pain and that this bias toward pain manifests before stimulus encounter. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging we investigated the neural mechanisms underlying the influence of an experimental manipulation of threat on the perception of … Show more
“…This finding is consistent with several studies associating insula activity with the processing of negative social and emotional information, such as pain and anxiety (Simmons, Matthews, Stein, & Paulus, 2004;Wiech et al, 2010). The insula is broadly involved in the subjective experience of emotions (Craig, 2011;Gu, Hof, Friston, & Fan, 2013) and has often been shown to be active during the processing of negative emotions (Duerden, Arsalidou, Lee, & Taylor, 2013).…”
Interpersonal trust and distrust are important components of human social interaction. Although several studies have shown that brain function is associated with either trusting or distrusting others, very little is known regarding brain function during the control of social attitudes, including trust and distrust. This study was designed to investigate the neural mechanisms involved when people attempt to control their attitudes of trust or distrust toward another person. We used a novel control-of-attitudes fMRI task, which involved explicit instructions to control attitudes of interpersonal trust and distrust. Control of trust or distrust was operationally defined as changes in trustworthiness evaluations of neutral faces before and after the control-of-attitudes fMRI task. Overall, participants (n = 60) evaluated faces paired with the distrust instruction as being less trustworthy than faces paired with the trust instruction following the control-of-distrust task. Within the brain, both the control-of-trust and control-ofdistrust conditions were associated with increased temporoparietal junction, precuneus (PrC), inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), and medial prefrontal cortex activity. Individual differences in the control of trust were associated with PrC activity, and individual differences in the control of distrust were associated with IFG activity. Together, these findings identify a brain network involved in the explicit control of distrust and trust and indicate that the PrC and IFG may serve to consolidate interpersonal social attitudes.
“…This finding is consistent with several studies associating insula activity with the processing of negative social and emotional information, such as pain and anxiety (Simmons, Matthews, Stein, & Paulus, 2004;Wiech et al, 2010). The insula is broadly involved in the subjective experience of emotions (Craig, 2011;Gu, Hof, Friston, & Fan, 2013) and has often been shown to be active during the processing of negative emotions (Duerden, Arsalidou, Lee, & Taylor, 2013).…”
Interpersonal trust and distrust are important components of human social interaction. Although several studies have shown that brain function is associated with either trusting or distrusting others, very little is known regarding brain function during the control of social attitudes, including trust and distrust. This study was designed to investigate the neural mechanisms involved when people attempt to control their attitudes of trust or distrust toward another person. We used a novel control-of-attitudes fMRI task, which involved explicit instructions to control attitudes of interpersonal trust and distrust. Control of trust or distrust was operationally defined as changes in trustworthiness evaluations of neutral faces before and after the control-of-attitudes fMRI task. Overall, participants (n = 60) evaluated faces paired with the distrust instruction as being less trustworthy than faces paired with the trust instruction following the control-of-distrust task. Within the brain, both the control-of-trust and control-ofdistrust conditions were associated with increased temporoparietal junction, precuneus (PrC), inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), and medial prefrontal cortex activity. Individual differences in the control of trust were associated with PrC activity, and individual differences in the control of distrust were associated with IFG activity. Together, these findings identify a brain network involved in the explicit control of distrust and trust and indicate that the PrC and IFG may serve to consolidate interpersonal social attitudes.
“…However, the anterior insula may also play a role in contributing the significance of a stimulus into decisions about pain (Wiech et al, 2010). By contrast, our data are consistent with the notion that sensory evoked responses in the prefrontal and posterior parietal cortices may contribute to spatial discrimination of the sensory input (Oshiro et al, 2007).…”
Section: Dose-dependent Versus Dose-independent Brain Activations: Evsupporting
“…It alerts us to the role of the researcher or clinician as observer, and to his or her moral and cultural biases (for example, see Encandela 85 ). It is entirely consistent with the rapidly expanding field of neuroscience, in which excitatory pain pathways become active, and inhibitory pathways are quiet, in the presence of anxiety, 86 depression, 87 threat, 88 and catastrophic thoughts about pain, 89 and the opposite happens as people with pain learn to regain control by various methods, such as CBT or mindfulness. 90 This opens up the possibility that, in future, rather than aiming to use psychological methods only to rehabilitate people despite ongoing pain, we will start to target their pain as well.…”
Section: Rethinking Pain From a Psychological Perspectivesupporting
After reviewing how psychological treatment for chronic pain comes to have its current form, and summarizing treatment effectiveness, we explore several areas of development. We describe third wave therapies, such as mindfulness; we discuss what the research literature aggregated can tell us about what trials are more useful to conduct; and we outline some areas of promise and some failures to deliver on promise. The article is drawn together using the framework of the normal psychology of pain, identifying some of its most important implications for improving life for people with chronic pain.
W W W
Nouveaux développements de la prise en charge psychologique de la douleur chroniqueAprès avoir étudié comment le traitement psychologique de la douleur chronique en est venu à sa forme actuelle, et résumé l'efficacité des traitements, nous explorons plusieurs domaines du développement. Nous décrivons les thérapies de troisième vague comme la pleine conscience, nous discutons de ce que peut nous apprendre la littérature de recherche regroupée à propos des essais les plus utiles à mener, nous présentons des domaines prometteurs et d'autres qui n'ont pas tenu leur promesse. La structure de l'article est le cadre de la psychologie normale de la douleur, qui identifie certaines des implications les plus importantes pour améliorer la vie des personnes souffrant de douleur chronique. P sychological treatments for chronic pain have been in continuous development since the 1960s, broadly parallel to changes in mainstream psychological treatments, especially within the ambit of CBT. There are several conceptual threads that can be discerned in the current state. 1
BehaviouralBehavioural methods apply operant learning theory to the analysis of pain. The primary objective is to modify a range of pain-related behaviours, such as activity, medication use, and social interactions, by changing environmental contingencies and the settings in which pain-related behaviour occurs. The cardinal feature of the original behavioural approach was that it explicitly eschewed direct attempts to modify the sensory-intensity component of the pain experience. 2
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.