1966
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(66)90054-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anterior displacement of the mandible in adult rhesus monkeys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
1

Year Published

1977
1977
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Most experiments have been performed on various species of macaques and rodents, and the majority indicate that a specific remodeling response can be seen in the condylar structure when occlusal functioning is actively altered. Great differences exist between the results, however, regarding possible changes in condylar growth rate after changed occlusal function (Hiniker and Ramfjord, 1966;Charlier et al, 1969;McNamara and Carlson, 1979).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most experiments have been performed on various species of macaques and rodents, and the majority indicate that a specific remodeling response can be seen in the condylar structure when occlusal functioning is actively altered. Great differences exist between the results, however, regarding possible changes in condylar growth rate after changed occlusal function (Hiniker and Ramfjord, 1966;Charlier et al, 1969;McNamara and Carlson, 1979).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Secondary cartilage may respond quite differently to small and large pressures, as shown by Copray et al (1985), and this may explain the controversy concerning earlier experimental results on possible growth increase after anterior movement of the mandible (Hiniker and Ramfjord. 1966;Charlier et al, 1969;McNamara and Carlson, 1979).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Experimental studies involving alteration of occlusal relationships in subadult nonhuman primates (McNamara, 1972;Stockli and Willert, 1971; Joho, 1973) have also indicated the joint (particularly the condyle) to be responsive to induced differences in oral function. However, the absence of similar adaptive changes in the joints of adult animals (Hiniker and Ramfjord, 1966; Ramfjord and Enlow, 1971) has led to the suggestion (McNamara, 1972) that this alterability of joint tissues may be confined to growing animals. In the lower joint component, this view is consistent with a n increasing awareness of the condyle as a site of compensatory or adaptive growth whose cartilage is transformed by early adulthood into a mature form that has apparently lost the capability for further growth (McNamara, 1972;Durkin et al, 1973).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first experimental model that we will discuss is not new and has been used by many investigators since its introduction by Carl Breitner (Breitner, 1930;Haupl and Psansky, 1939;Derichsweiler, 1958;Baume and Derichsweiler, 1961;Hiniker and Ramfjord, 1966;Joho, 1968;Stockli and Willert, 1971), also in our laboratory for the last 11 years (Elgoyhen et al, 1972;McNamara, , 1973aMcNamara, , 1976McNamara and Carlson, 1979).…”
Section: Studies Of Functional Protrusionmentioning
confidence: 99%